Just for additional info, here's the Romanian weight that I have which I was reminded of when I saw the style of design in Mike's piece:
The weight.
The full signature (using the talc highlight method).
Can you decipher that signature without first looking at the image of the label? Have a go.
To make it a bit easier (?) here's the three parts individually ...
Part onePart twoPart threeAny ideas yet?
OK,
here's the label. [Note the spelling of "Colection"]
I find it fascinating to try to decipher script signatures, and then see that much of what I thought was way off the mark! By the way, the first part of the signature line actually says "Design".
Now, I'm not saying that Mike's piece is by the same maker as mine, but the working is similar in some respects. I think Mike's was formed by first covering a white core with coloured frit then forming it into a sort of spiral or screw thread. Next a couple of thick lengths of multi-coloured twist canes, enclosed in clear, were shaped into a rectangular tube and then laid over the core, up one side, over the top and down the oppsite side. The whole is then covered in clear and finsihed to the dome shape.
My weight was based on an art glass sculpture which used the two intertwined twists but was not covered in clear. The weight was an extension of this but adding a clear dome around the sculpture - which is where the large air bubble came in near the base (not easy to avoid when encasing that design).
Another point about my weight is that I bought it as an example of that Romanian work, which was sold in the UK through the TK Maxx store (the weight still has the store label and price on the base). However, at the time, another weight of this form was sold through the now infamous "Chris M" eBay sales and was falsely signed as being from a "more collectable" source.