The comments are showing fine for me.
But the 'conclusion' part on WF.com is always a little slipshod when it comes to glass that isn't Whitefriars - I remember one instance of someone floating in with some optic-ribbed glass and once it was discounted as Whitefriars the owner of the glass announced that it must be Kastrup glass, because they'd seen something a little bit similar in a book. Consequently, the conclusion was logged as Kastrup before anyone could further respond.
The site's a great place for info on Whitefriars, but decidedly shaky when the attributions veer elsewhere.