mhgcgolfclub
Members
 Offline
Location: West Sussex UK
Posts: 499
|
 |
« on: May 04, 2010, 08:25:22 PM » |
|
Help to ID this Old English paperweight please.
Diameter 3.25" or 8cm, height 2.5", rough snapped pontil
Thanks Roy
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
|
|
keith
Members
Offline
Location: west midlands
Posts: 1926
|
|
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2010, 08:27:49 PM » |
|
Out of my comfort zone but the colour reminds me of Bacchus,beautiful weight whatever it is,
Keith.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
|
|
alexander
Members
Offline
Gender: 
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 480
|
|
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2010, 10:20:22 PM » |
|
A beautiful weight! May we see a profile pic please.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Alexander
Norwegian glass collector
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
mhgcgolfclub
Members
Offline
Location: West Sussex UK
Posts: 499
|
|
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2010, 06:02:37 PM » |
|
Thank you
Another picture of the weight
Roy
|
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
tropdevin
Members
Offline
Location: England
Posts: 701
|
|
« Reply #4 on: May 08, 2010, 04:57:47 PM » |
|
Hi Roy
A very neat weight - that, the design, the colours, and some of the canes strongly suggest Richardson to me. I don't think it is a Bacchus: the short sections of cane and way the base is finished are wrong for that maker.
Alan
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Alan The comments in this posting reflect the opinion of the author, Alan Thornton, and not that of the owners, administrators or moderators of this board. Comments are copyright Alan Thornton. Please feel free to contact me direct if you do not agree with my comments and do not wish to make your concerns known by posting in this thread. http://www.pwts.co.uk and http://www.crosscountryski.co.uk
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
mhgcgolfclub
Members
Offline
Location: West Sussex UK
Posts: 499
|
|
« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2010, 03:24:44 PM » |
|
Thank you very much Alan
If it were Richardson as you believe what would the approx date be
Thanks Roy
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
keith
Members
Offline
Location: west midlands
Posts: 1926
|
|
« Reply #6 on: May 09, 2010, 04:36:53 PM » |
|
Going on Alans response I think it would be early 20th century for a Richardson pwt,best I can do,if you ever get fed up of it let me know I'll give it a good home  Keith. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
tropdevin
Members
Offline
Location: England
Posts: 701
|
|
« Reply #7 on: May 09, 2010, 04:46:04 PM » |
|
Hi All
Dating Richardson pieces is not straightforward, especially paperweights. Various incarnations of 'Richardson' family groups ran glass factories from pre-1845 to post 1900. The only documented Richardson paperweight designs are, I believe, early 1900s - but then, there are no documented Bacchus paperweight designs (or Clichy, as far as I know!). One cannot rule out Richardson making paperweights in the 1845 - 1860 period, and IMHO, it would be very odd if they had not produced some at that time. They were a competent business, and would have seen the success others were having with paperweights. I have measured the density of a lot of Richardson paperweights and ink wells, and also some pieces in Broadfield House museum that date to the 1840s. Unfortunately, they are all very similar in density - which suggests that Richardson used much the same glass recipe throughout.
I cannot say with any confidence when this particular weight was made, but my suspicion is that it is earlier than the documented designs - ie 19th century.
Alan
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Alan The comments in this posting reflect the opinion of the author, Alan Thornton, and not that of the owners, administrators or moderators of this board. Comments are copyright Alan Thornton. Please feel free to contact me direct if you do not agree with my comments and do not wish to make your concerns known by posting in this thread. http://www.pwts.co.uk and http://www.crosscountryski.co.uk
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
keith
Members
Offline
Location: west midlands
Posts: 1926
|
|
« Reply #8 on: May 09, 2010, 04:48:15 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
KevH
Global Moderator
Members
Offline
Location: UK
Posts: 2506
|
|
« Reply #9 on: May 09, 2010, 11:34:09 PM » |
|
Don't worry, Keith. Alan is one of the very few folk who have made a comprehensive study of Old English weights and it is only recently that his findings have been published in collector literature. So most of us are in the same stage of learning.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
KevH
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
|
