No-one likes general adverts, and ours hadn't been updated for ages, so we're having a clear-out and a change round to make the new ones useful to you. These new adverts bring in a small amount to help pay for the board and keep it free for you to use, so please do use them whenever you can, Let our links help you find great books on glass or a new piece for your collection. Thank you for supporting the Board.

Author Topic: Possibly Loetz Chine? ID - Wilhem Kralik iridescent vase  (Read 8981 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cathy B

  • Global Moderator
  • Members
  • *
  • Posts: 2772
  • Gender: Female
    • The Crown Crystal Glass Company of Australia
Possibly Loetz Chine? ID - Wilhem Kralik iridescent vase
« on: January 20, 2006, 11:00:00 AM »
Hello - I have finally got my computer access back!
 
There used to be some good information on a website somewhere on identifying fake Loetz for the novice, but it appears to have disappeared. In particular, I seem to recall that many of these fakes have the chine effect (excuse the spelling: the French acute is beyond my ken).

Can anyone expand on this?

Kind regards,
Cathy

Mod: This vase is a Wilhem Kralik iridescent vase with an applied rim and trails. See the Great Glass site, navigate to the picture gallery, then choose the third page, Austro-Bohemian & German (others), and scroll to Kralik, for similar vases.

Offline Della

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 1559
  • Gender: Female
  • Addicted to glass!
    • Costa Teguise, Lanzarote
Possibly Loetz Chine?
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2006, 11:20:37 AM »
Hi Cathy,
I have just visited this site;

http://www.loetz.com/

It has some great information. Hope it helps.
If I know, I'll comment. If I think I know, I'll have a go. If I have no idea, I'll just keep quiet and learn from others, so the next time I'll know.

Offline Cathy B

  • Global Moderator
  • Members
  • *
  • Posts: 2772
  • Gender: Female
    • The Crown Crystal Glass Company of Australia
Possibly Loetz Chine?
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2006, 12:02:27 PM »
Hello DeltaB,

Thanks for that. Would most fakes be signed these days, do you think? They have some fantastic info on signatures, but nothing on unsigned work.

For instance, Loetz would have always ground their pontils, wouldn't they?

I've found what _could_ be a Loetz Chine decor hyacinth vase with trofen, or a fake. It's quite a significant price, but fairly reasonable if it's Loetz. It is not signed.

Thanks!!

Cathy

Offline B & M

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 87
Possibly Loetz Chine?
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2006, 05:00:25 PM »
I don't recall ever seeing any fake Loetz, i.e. pieces made intentionally to deceive.  There is, however, a lot of irridescent glass, old and new,which is often passed off as being Loetz by unscrupulous sellers, who might even add a fake Loetz signiature to a piece by an unknown maker.

To my knowledge, the vast majority of Loetz's output was unsigned. In fact, i would be more wary of a signed piece for the reasons described above.

If there are any modern fakes around, they should be fairly easy to identify: I would expect differences in the irridescence and of course the base would show no wear or the obvious marks left by sandpaper or other abrasive in the attempt to add age to a new piece.

My advice would be to examine the piece thouroughly and compare its style and decoration to the pieces identified on the Loetz site, in particular the threaded Kralik & Pallme-Koenig examples. Attribution of this type of glass is very difficult, however and it is common practice among many auction houses to identify all irridescent glss from this era as 'Loetz' or 'Loetz type'.

Ultimately though, what does it matter who made it? It may turn out to be by Kralik or another maker, but it is still the same item.  In your position, I would base my decision to buy or not on the quality and aesthetic appeal of the item regardless of maker.

Sklounion

  • Guest
Possibly Loetz Chine?
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2006, 09:54:54 PM »
Quote
Ultimately though, what does it matter who made it? It may turn out to be by Kralik or another maker, but it is still the same item. In your position, I would base my decision to buy or not on the quality and aesthetic appeal of the item regardless of maker.


With all due respect here, B&M, what are you saying? That it does not matter that a Powolny design, for, and  made by Loetz, has no different value, if the design were made by, for example, Liuligongfang????

Cathy, welcome back, you have been missed, our queen of pressed glass, southern hemisphere chapter. Hope all's gone well with the move?

Marcus

Offline Frank

  • Author
  • Members
  • ***
  • Posts: 9508
  • Gender: Male
    • Glass history
    • Europe
    • Gateway
Re: Fake Loetz Chine
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2006, 10:21:31 PM »
Quote from: "Cathy Bannister"
There used to be some good information on a website somewhere on identifying fake Loetz for the novice, but it appears to have disappeared.


When a website passes away r.i.p. You can often find it here http://www.archive.org/web/web.php although it is usually about a year behind the rest of the web. One presumes it takes that long to reach the cyber pearly gates.

Offline Frank

  • Author
  • Members
  • ***
  • Posts: 9508
  • Gender: Male
    • Glass history
    • Europe
    • Gateway
Possibly Loetz Chine?
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2006, 10:23:04 PM »

Offline Della

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 1559
  • Gender: Female
  • Addicted to glass!
    • Costa Teguise, Lanzarote
Possibly Loetz Chine?
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2006, 10:28:58 PM »
Hi Frank,
That is the same site as I gave, just a different link. :lol:  :lol:
Great site though non-the-less.
If I know, I'll comment. If I think I know, I'll have a go. If I have no idea, I'll just keep quiet and learn from others, so the next time I'll know.

Offline B & M

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 87
Possibly Loetz Chine?
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2006, 10:33:33 PM »
Hello Le Casson,

Regarding my earlier comments, what I meant was simply that if Cathy appreciates the design of the piece and considers it pleasing enough to buy, then this perhaps is a better motivation to purchase than some tentative attribution to a possible designer or maker.  

As regards Powolny and (any other named designers who may come into fashion), yes an attribution to him makes a significant difference as to what a piece might sell for but in my experience such attributions are very often made with little or no evidence.  It now seems that every tango piece that comes onto the market is a Powolny, when, in fact, they are merely influenced by his designs. Austro-Bohemian glass is one of the most difficult areas to research and many (arguably the majority of) items are sold with incorrect attributions anyway and may make unpredictable prices as a result.

It is perhaps only my personal opinion but I cannot help but feel that the prime appeal of art glass should be aesthetic rather than monetary. Of course, this is practically not the case and many regard items as an investment or buy them only for the purposes of speculation; an arguably valid approach (and one which I have adopted when dealing), but one which fuels a market in which there is a recognition of a few designers at the expense of many more. More who themselves may well have been as competent but didn't for some reason make it into the right books and television programmes to capture the popular imagination.
 
I would have to check auction records and dealer prices to verify this but if memory serves Chine is far from the most desirable of Loetz decors and hence would not necessarily make a great deal more than a fine example by Kralik. In this specific situation I would simply use quality as a guide, both the tangible quality of execution, i.e. how well made is the piece, how good is the irridescence, and the more intangible qualities of design to decide whether or not to buy it. This, of course, is an entirely personal approach but one which I have found to be very worthwhile.

Offline Leni

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 2273
Possibly Loetz Chine?
« Reply #9 on: January 21, 2006, 10:14:27 AM »
Quote from: "B & M"
It is perhaps only my personal opinion but I cannot help but feel that the prime appeal of art glass should be aesthetic rather than monetary.

Oh, mine too!  Absolutely!   :D  A person after my own heart!   :roll:

Sometimes around here I have felt like a lone voice crying in the wilderness!    :roll:  (No offence, anybody!   :oops: )  :wink:
Leni

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
Visit the Glass Encyclopedia
link to glass encyclopedia
Visit the Online Glass Museum
link to glass museum


This website is provided by Angela Bowey, PO Box 113, Paihia 0247, New Zealand