chearn
Members
 Offline
Location: Dorchester, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3
|
 |
« on: February 14, 2006, 03:04:12 PM » |
|
Good Morning:
I'm in the process of preparing an educational program for our local glass collecting group. The topic I have selected is Molasses Cans, "aka" Syrup Pitchers. I have a collection of 65 pieces which will be the reference part of my presentation. The collection is from the 1880 to about 1915 time period and mainly in colour and is American pressed or mould blown glass.
My question; I have never understood why the have been refered to as cans. Cans when I think about the word leaves me with the idea that they should be made of metal not glass. Recently I have thought it was maybe just a short form for the word containers, molasses containers.
Here come the curve. I have just looked over a copy of the Pressed Glass Collectors Club publication which has reprinted the pages from George Davidson's & Co. #1 and 2 catalogues. On page 11 there is a reprint of half pint handled drinking mugs and the page is headed up as "CANS". Now I have to think that is it not just a short form for the word containers, there must be some additional meaning. If anyone can clarify the use of the word Cans in glass terminology I would appreciate the helping hand.
Thank You
Carl Hearn
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
Della
Members
Offline
Gender: 
Location: Amington, Tamworth
Posts: 1259
happy, happy, happy....... ;-)
|
|
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2006, 03:19:52 PM » |
|
I was always of the impression that the word can/s, was a shortened version of the word Canister/s.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Enjoying being in the Midlands.......some people are just amazing....
xx
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
Lustrousstone
Members
Offline
Gender:
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 7853
|
|
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2006, 04:32:52 PM » |
|
In Merriam-Webster's Collegiate dictionary (US) the first definition of can is a 'usually' cylindrical receptacle; the second definition is a vessel for holding liquids, specifically a drinking vessel. Middle English from the Old English canne. Metal is not mentioned till the 4th and 5th definitions
But in the Oxford dictionary, can is now specifically a cylindrical METAL container.
So your molasses pitchers use the first US meaning and the Davidson catalogue the seond, which is no longer in UK dictionaries.
An interesting evolution of language
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
Pinkspoons
Members
Offline
Gender: 
Location: N.E. Lincolnshire, UK.
Posts: 2777
|
|
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2006, 04:34:21 PM » |
|
Or possibly Canteen...?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Nic Wilson
Causality... it's just one thing after another...
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
Ivo
Author
Members
Offline
Gender:
Location: Leiden, Netherlands
Posts: 5822
|
|
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2006, 04:35:10 PM » |
|
Most likely from the Dutch word for pitcher or jug: KAN. A "Kan" is also a standard measure of liquid
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ivo► BLUE HENRY ◄ New Book: The Almost Forgotten Story of the Blue Glass Sputum Flaskall texts and pictures (c) Ivo Haanstra.
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
Lustrousstone
Members
Offline
Gender:
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 7853
|
|
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2006, 04:38:41 PM » |
|
Kan, kanne (German), can - they're all related. From the Oxford dictionary: 'either of germanic origin or from the Late Latin canna'.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
pamela
Members
Offline
Gender:
Location: Hamburg Germany
Posts: 2143
|
|
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2006, 05:46:14 PM » |
|
seonded!  " Kanne " in German always has got a handle and it is larger than a "Kännchen" which would be a creamer Not always it goes with a lid, but we also say Kaffeekanne and Teekanne - (coffee and tea) - lidded of course :wink: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
Glen
Author
Members
Offline
Gender:
Location: England
Posts: 2721
|
|
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2006, 08:04:59 PM » |
|
Sowerby's catalogs from the late 1800s show many CANS. They are handled drinking vessels. We'd call them glass mugs (or even tankards) today.
Glen
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Riihimäki e-book—just launched! Sowerby e-books—three volumes available For all info see www.thistlewoods.netCarnival Glass Research and Writing All images and writing Copyright G&S Thistlewood
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
Adam
Glass Professional
Members
Offline
Location: York, England
Posts: 355
Sowerby 1949-56, Davidson 1956-61, Jobling 1961-72
|
|
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2006, 10:21:27 PM » |
|
The few remaining handled drinking vessels still being made at Sowerbys when I was there in the 1950s were still called cans. I never understood it either!
Adam D.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This post reflects the opinion of the author and not necessarily that of the owner, administrators, or moderators of this board.
|
|
|
|
