No-one likes general adverts, and ours hadn't been updated for ages, so we're having a clear-out and a change round to make the new ones useful to you. These new adverts bring in a small amount to help pay for the board and keep it free for you to use, so please do use them whenever you can, Let our links help you find great books on glass or a new piece for your collection. Thank you for supporting the Board.

Author Topic: Frank Thrower Showstopper Vase or inspired by, rip-off, or test piece?  (Read 2985 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline scavo

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 722
Picked this up on a car boot. My first impression was that it was styled after Thrower's Showstopper, knocked out in China or elsewhere, quite recently. But before I car boot it myself, I'd like to rule out the idea that it could be a test piece or a seconds.

I've taken some pictures next to a couple of Showstopper decanters for comparison. The vase doesn't have a pontil.


Offline Lustrousstone

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 13623
  • Gender: Female
    • Warrington, UK
    • My Gallery
It's unlikely to be inspired by anything and could have been made anywhere. The ripply effect occurs when the sides are flattened on the marver and then not smoothed out. That's probably where FT got his inspiration from.

Offline scavo

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 722
Thanks Christine. I can see that it isn't the same quality as F/T either in the actual glass or the execution.

I need to learn more about how glass is made ...

Offline Lustrousstone

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 13623
  • Gender: Female
    • Warrington, UK
    • My Gallery
Take a trip to St Helens World of Glass for a start; that's not too far for you. http://www.worldofglass.com/

Then there's the Red House Cone (longer day trip) and, for commercial glass, Dartington itself (but that's a bit far for a day trip).

Offline Patrick

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 768
The ripply effect occurs when the sides are flattened on the marver and then not smoothed out.

These ripples have come from the mould that the glass was blown into......... More pronounced when the mould is cold . Please note that the mould sides would be smooth and not rippled.

All best wishes,
                       Patrick.

Offline scavo

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 722
Thanks Patrick. I understand. My limited 'knowledge' tells me that the vase and the Thrower pieces were made in a very similar way: blown into a wet wooden box. The accuracy of the Thrower pieces, and the wonkiness of the unknown piece are down to the skill of the blower, if indeed symmetry was desired in the latter.

Thanks Christine. We have friends in Wigan. I know about Pilkington/Ravenhead, but didn't know about the visitor's centre. I will put it together with a trip to a flea market.

Offline chopin-liszt

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 14462
    • Scotland, Europe.
 ???
I don't see any need for a mould to be used - flattening the sides on the marver would have exactly the same effect and be far more time-efficient and cost effective.
Cheers, Sue M. (she/her)

‘For every problem there is a solution: neat, plausible and wrong’. H.L.Mencken

Offline Patrick

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 768
Hi Sue,
 Sorry to disagree with you here............ These are certainly blown into a mould and trying to do the same on a marver would take immense skill and a long time. 
 I will ask Adam to look at this topic and give his views on this.

 Best wishes,
               Patrick.
 ps,   This video shows the use of  a wooden mould that does not give the ripple/cooling effect. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozYW5yZjq54

Offline scavo

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 722
Thank you so much Patrick. Much to learn from those vids I didn't even know they were there!

Offline chopin-liszt

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 14462
    • Scotland, Europe.
I was simply mentally comparing it to tons of Mdina which is flattened on the marver to make vessels into different shapes - such as the (uncut) cut-ice pieces and the uncut cube shaped vases too.

All were originally flattened on the marver, some of the sides got cut and polished flat afterwards. They didn't use moulds - the bits are all different sizes!

Given so much was done in this manner there, I just assumed it would be much easier than using a mould - which would have had to be made.
Cheers, Sue M. (she/her)

‘For every problem there is a solution: neat, plausible and wrong’. H.L.Mencken

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
Visit the Glass Encyclopedia
link to glass encyclopedia
Visit the Online Glass Museum
link to glass museum


This website is provided by Angela Bowey, PO Box 113, Paihia 0247, New Zealand