Thanks Trevor,
Yeah, suspected so from your previous article. Wasn't really sure about date range he marked pieces this way.
Size is;
Height: 110mm
Base: 63mm square [35mm high there]
Bulb: 80mm diameter
It's pretty with all the entrained bubbles around blue. Silver trails appear to be a different colour to what appears around rim are, being more of a golden iridescent finish, but not like the usual peacock kinda iridescent finish applied post forming. I guess, iridescent isn't correct description.
Images are poor I must say. Shape not so skew in reality. Camera angle and macro setting distortion. Really should do better on that... soon. Only excuse is pushed for time.
What do you know about why the cryptic 'arrow' Trevor?
Was it due to Robert seeking some anonymity, having the glass be focus rather than the artist?
Does this relate to a degree of disillusion with political machinations in the art glass movement at the time?
I bet there are some unique stories about the early years and many who would prefer 'no comment' and 'let sleeping dogs be'. I'm assuming that, having read a Mr King article about the early Aus. years and exhibitions.
Or, perhaps it's a simple K Because thats less work to engrave?
I can relate to that, I mark works I've done with a stylised N rather than an egocentric full name tag.