No-one likes general adverts, and ours hadn't been updated for ages, so we're having a clear-out and a change round to make the new ones useful to you. These new adverts bring in a small amount to help pay for the board and keep it free for you to use, so please do use them whenever you can, Let our links help you find great books on glass or a new piece for your collection. Thank you for supporting the Board.

Author Topic: discussion about this forum  (Read 2995 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Frank

  • Author
  • Members
  • ***
  • Posts: 9451
  • Gender: Male
    • Glass history
    • Europe
    • Gateway
discussion about this forum
« Reply #10 on: August 09, 2006, 08:48:49 PM »
It doesn't work Anne, I had someone telling me recently that certain things were in one thread but not in the other. Non-ITish folks get confused when they suddenly appear in a different forum.

Support the Glass Message Board by finding a book via

Offline KevinH

  • Global Moderator
  • Members
  • *
  • Posts: 6157
    • England
discussion about this forum
« Reply #11 on: August 10, 2006, 12:30:37 AM »
It was accepted from early days that the way the GMB forums are classified is not perfect and it will always be difficult to decide where best to discuss certain issues.

For example, should someone who focuses solely on Murano Glass come into the Paperweight forum to discuss which, if any, of the Toso family may have had something to do with a weight they have? Maybe the best and most meaningful responses to that sort of question could be gained by examining non-paperweight items and therefore having the discussion in the Murano forum.

On the point that has been raised about the purpose of this forum, it has been said,
This forum is for identification purposes ...
But the description of the forum actually states,
For information requests and discussions about Glass Paperweights ...

So, on the basis of the forum description, I logically agree that the "ebay effect on paperweights" topic is something that belongs in here. But I also agree that the subject is wider reaching than just paperweights and, like my analogy to the "Toso" question above, I think there could be useful input by having the discussion outside of this forum.

What I would suggest is that if there is something really useful in relation to paperweights, that comes out of wider discussions, then that information is posted in here as a means for retention, probably via subsequent archiving. (If the wider discussion is in the Cafe, then any meaningful points may just get lost.)

Support the Glass Message Board by finding glass through


SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
Look for glass on
Visit the Glass Encyclopedia
link to glass encyclopedia
Look for glass on (us)
Visit the Online Glass Museum
link to glass museum

This website is provided by Angela Bowey, PO Box 113, Paihia 0247, New Zealand