Glass Message Board

Glass Identification - Post here for all ID requests => Glass Paperweights => Topic started by: yesvil on February 09, 2011, 04:52:12 PM

Title: Miniature weight with label remnants for id
Post by: yesvil on February 09, 2011, 04:52:12 PM
Is this made by Vasart? I have seen a similar label shape for them.

http://flic.kr/p/9gUb2V
Title: Re: Miniature weight with label remnants for id
Post by: johnphilip on February 09, 2011, 06:04:09 PM
The shape looks the same as a Vasart i sold a few weeks back . The label that is .
Title: Re: Miniature weight with label remnants for id
Post by: yesvil on February 09, 2011, 08:21:57 PM
The shape looks the same as a Vasart i sold a few weeks back . The label that is .

Thanks - Anyone else use this shape of Label?
Title: Re: Miniature weight with label remnants for id
Post by: RAY on February 09, 2011, 08:55:52 PM
pirelli used the same label on vasart made weights
Title: Re: Miniature weight with label remnants for id
Post by: yesvil on February 10, 2011, 08:43:14 AM
pirelli used the same label on vasart made weights

Do you know if Pirelli used this label up to their demise? which I believe was much later then Vasart.
Title: Re: Miniature weight with label remnants for id
Post by: KevinH on February 10, 2011, 09:43:28 PM
As far as I know, all weights with a Pirelli label were made by Vasart.
Title: Re: Miniature weight with label remnants for id
Post by: yesvil on February 12, 2011, 04:39:59 PM
As far as I know, all weights with a Pirelli label were made by Vasart.

Thanks - So my weight should be pre 1964 I presume.
Title: Re: Miniature weight with label remnants for id
Post by: KevinH on February 12, 2011, 09:44:36 PM
1956 to 1964/5.

The "shaped" Vasart label (same shape as for the Pirelli label) is not known to have been used before 1956.
Title: Re: Miniature weight with label remnants for id
Post by: yesvil on February 12, 2011, 09:54:38 PM
1956 to 1964/5.

The "shaped" Vasart label (same shape as for the Pirelli label) is not known to have been used before 1956.

That's very helpful - Thank you!