Glass Message Board

Glass Discussion & Research. NO IDENTIFICATION REQUESTS here please. => Murano & Italy Glass => Topic started by: interiorforms on April 29, 2009, 07:14:53 PM

Title: Rough vs. Polished Bases
Post by: interiorforms on April 29, 2009, 07:14:53 PM
I know most Murano glass bases are polished on the foot, while others have a rough, broken-off pontil mark. What can one tell about a piece if it has a rough, or semi-rough, pontil mark? I apologize if this has been previously addressed! -Kimberly
Title: Re: Rough vs. Polished Bases
Post by: Ivo on April 29, 2009, 07:58:07 PM
depends on the piece. Often it means "made in Poland"or "made in China".  In all cases it means "the manufacturer did not think this piece was worth finishing properly".
Title: Re: Rough vs. Polished Bases
Post by: Lustrousstone on April 30, 2009, 06:30:57 AM
I think we would need pictures of the base and the item to make a more accurate assessment
Title: Re: Rough vs. Polished Bases
Post by: langhaugh on April 30, 2009, 07:13:36 AM
I believe some Murano pieces didn't have finished pontils, some Salviati fazzolletto, for example. I also seem to remember that some early Venini had a very specific type of pontil mark that could be be felt, but I'm less sure of that. I'll check my reference in the morning.

 I wouldn't rule out a piece piece being Murano only because of the pontil not being finished, but it would lead me to doing much more research on the piece. If you have a piece that fits into this category, it would be much easier to provide guidance if a picture were provided. A specific context tends to lead to a more conclusive answer.

David
Title: Re: Rough vs. Polished Bases
Post by: interiorforms on April 30, 2009, 04:33:26 PM
This one particularly has a rough pontil:
http://i487.photobucket.com/albums/rr236/interiorforms/birdbase01.jpg
http://i487.photobucket.com/albums/rr236/interiorforms/muranobird02.jpg
Title: Re: Rough vs. Polished Bases
Post by: interiorforms on April 30, 2009, 04:40:35 PM
My mistake... the second photo in my last post should be this: (although that bird too has a rough pontil)


http://i487.photobucket.com/albums/rr236/interiorforms/birdbase07.jpg
Title: Re: Rough vs. Polished Bases
Post by: Artofvenice on May 03, 2009, 08:41:30 PM
In general the thick glass is polished on the base. The thin glass (goblets, light blown glassworks...) not.
Obviously there are also inexpensive glassworks left unpolished to save time and money.
Sometimes the base is not polished to remove the pontil, but just the make the piece more stable.
Anyway no fixed rules about it...

www.artofvenice.com (http://www.artofvenice.com)
Title: Re: Rough vs. Polished Bases
Post by: langhaugh on May 03, 2009, 11:11:15 PM
Since angels seem to be be fearing to tread here, I'll jump in to offer an opinion. They both seem like good quality Murano. I can see why the pontil would be left rough, as shown in the photograph. That is, it would be hard to polish and not much would be gained. I wouldn't be surprised if the birds were by one (or two) of the better known furnaces, Barbini or Seguso, but I would stop short of offering a positive attribution. There's still a little bit of angel left in me.

David