Topic: First attempt to post picture of PEILL & PUTZLER

[chopin-liszt]

:twisted: I SAID random bubbles were complicated! :twisted:  Thanks for all this, Frank, Cheers, Sue.

[chopin-liszt]

:shock:

A further point which should be added/discussed here is he fact that on p. 69 of Judith Miller's 20th Century Glass, there is a picture of a piece that looks JUST like schleiergraphit. It is by Maurice Marinot.

I have, since this thread started ages ago, acquired a few more of these pieces. I have seen a large piece on eBay, described as being Maurice Marinot-like. It fetched a good price too - £107, considerably more than I paid for one described as schleiergraphit.

Lesley Jackson's 20th Century Glass, pp62-3, points out that Maurice Marinot was an incredible influence at Daum, around the 20's.

Is schleiergraphit originally the work of Maurice Marinot? I would so-ooo love it to be! I adore Maurice Marinot's glass, I adored this piece, and it would be nice to think that I had been able to recognise the continuum. :oops:

[Max]

I've posted a very large hanging lamp under the thread:

http://www.glassmessages.com/index.php/topic,5099.0.html

Edit: 2008 NB;  My photo's missing from that thread now...cannot replace them, item sold

I hope it's ok me cross-referencing it here.

[Frank]

Good as time as any to bump this as it still has no explanation of the Nazeing bubble  :spls:

[Hotglass]

I have found this topic to be very interesting and informative, especially your contribution Frank. I don't think it should be dumped.
Max, I don't understand why you can't post pics just because the item now belongs to someone else. The pics are yours. Ed.

[Lustrousstone]

Max means she's got rid of/lost the picture as well as sold the item

[Hotglass]

Thanks Christine and I now see that I misread Frank's bump as dump. Apologies.
I hope you get your explanation Frank although your own explanation sounds pretty close to me.Ed.

[Frank]

I don't have an explanation for the Nazeing bubbles, can anyone add a picture of them? In these the bubbles are small, variable sixe, but each is surrounded by a darker area giving an almost eye-like appearance. Guessing I would say that the vapourising compound was gathered with the enamel - but then they also tend to be fairly evenly spaced, no overlaying or touching. Another guess would be that small glass beads are used. Nazeing did also produce bubbled pieces as illustrated above and they do not show this characteristic which 'appears' to be unique to Nazeing.

Probably worth adding that random bubbles (vs. controlled) can also be made by pricking the glass but this creates clear often drop like bubbles. Regular bubbles can also be done by hand using a pin wheel or similar device.