"Can you see any corresponding colour difference under normal light? If that's the mechanism, presumably it was 'struck'* when the pitcher was reheated to form the lip at the top?"
No, I can't discern any obvious difference under normal light. The tone and depth of the yellow seems uniform. The bottom may be just slightly paler, but the difference doesn't conform to the pattern of UV reactivity. And, yes, that was my hypothesis about it being struck (incidentally) at the top to form the upper neck and lip.
...But now, after reading Glen's post, that wouldn't seem to make sense, if in striking a piece for amberina the effect disappears. But then again, things are complicated by the presence of selenium (and whatever else is in there!). I was surprised to see that a modern company like Summit used cadmium, since it's known to be extrememly toxic.
Glass color chemistry "strikes" me as quite complex...and fascinating. If it were simply a matter of a bunch of ingredients thrown together and interacting, it would be one thing, but everything is changed by the addition of heat, whether the atmosphere is reducing or oxidizing, the impurities in the materials, etc.
A year or two ago I was trying to figure out the concensus these days on whether glass is a liquid or solid (it's an amorphous solid, though even that is still debated). I remember reading that even now the chemistry/structure of glass isn't very well understood.