No-one likes general adverts, and ours hadn't been updated for ages, so we're having a clear-out and a change round to make the new ones useful to you. These new adverts bring in a small amount to help pay for the board and keep it free for you to use, so please do use them whenever you can, Let our links help you find great books on glass or a new piece for your collection. Thank you for supporting the Board.

Author Topic: Bagley vs Rudolfova?  (Read 892 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chris Harrison

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 495
Bagley vs Rudolfova?
« on: June 18, 2009, 02:02:31 PM »
Just acquired what I thought was an 8" square version of the Bagley Salisbury vase (said to be 1932-onwards), as per Anne's photo at http://yobunny.org.uk/gallery1/displayimage.php?pid=700

But after looking through Marcus's CD last night, something rang a bell.  I checked again, and vase 9353 from the Rudolfova Hut pre-1958 catalogue appears to be identical - except that the artist's sketch for the RH vase has ridges on the square base.

Does anyone know why these vases are so similar? 
Whether Inwald "borrowed" the Bagley design or vice versa?
Or whether the version made at RH actually has the additional ridges?

Ta
Chris




Support the Glass Message Board by finding a book via book-seek.com


Offline Della

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 1559
  • Gender: Female
  • Addicted to glass!
    • Costa Teguise, Lanzarote
Re: Bagley vs Rudolfova?
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2009, 05:04:09 PM »

Hi Chris,

If you check page 9 of Marcus's book, you will find your answer. What is important is Marcus's explanation of the legal aspects that allowed Bagley to plunder Czech producers designs.

Della
xx
If I know, I'll comment. If I think I know, I'll have a go. If I have no idea, I'll just keep quiet and learn from others, so the next time I'll know.

Support the Glass Message Board by finding glass through glass-seek.com


Offline Chris Harrison

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 495
Re: Bagley vs Rudolfova?
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2009, 05:42:58 PM »
Oh, DUUUUUHHH!

Thanks, Della.

I remembered reading the bit about Davidson taking on the Durit glassware, but completely missed the Bagley reference.  Note to self: more haste, less speed...

Support the Glass Message Board by finding a book via book-seek.com


 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
Visit the Glass Encyclopedia
link to glass encyclopedia
Visit the Online Glass Museum
link to glass museum


This website is provided by Angela Bowey, PO Box 113, Paihia 0247, New Zealand