Glass Discussion & Research. NO IDENTIFICATION REQUESTS here please. > Scandinavian Glass
Riimihaen Lasi
Max:
Thanks for finding that site Peter :D I was quite annoyed I'd lost it! xx
On the subject of Riihimaen Lasi Oy, I think Ruth's found something I had overlooked previously. According to 'Smoke & Ice', this company was called Riihimaen Lasi until 1988 when it was merged with Karhula, forming Ahlstrom Riihimaen Lasi Oy. As the book says 'Riihimaen Lasi closed in 1990', perhaps it kept going as an independent unit also.
Should the correct attribution be Riihimaen Lasi (no Oy) before 1988 and only have the 'Oy' added post 1988? :?:
I feel like I'm hair-splitting, but I'm confused. :? Have I misunderstood?
tmaritta:
Hi Max,
The company name was Riihimäen Lasi Oy well before 1988 - quick google in Finnish brought some reference to Riihimäen Lasi Oy from 1910. Ahlström Riihimäen Lasi Oy changed its name to Karhulan Lasi Oy at some point. Today Karhulan Lasi Oy produces packing material out of glass for medical, food and brewery industry according to one recent document I found on the web. Karhulan Lasi Oy now belongs to Owens-Illinois, Inc.
According to book that I have, "Moderne Zeiten - Finnisches Glass 1929 -1999", Riihimäen Lasi ceased to produce studio glass (my translation for "in Handarbeit hergestelltem Glass") in 1976. I would guess that the reference to Riihimäen Lasi ceasing its operations in early 90's probably is meant to indicate that the company stopped producing any kind of decorative glass then (but couldn't really find any conclusive evidence, i.e. no full history recount of Riihimäen Lasi). I would also speculate that was when the name changed to ARL.
Regards,
TMaritta
Max:
TMaritta, I was hoping you'd see this thread. :D :D
Thank you very much for your help. After a while, you don't easily believe anything you read on glass! Perhaps Smoke & Ice could have been worded better, but I suppose that condensing a companys facts into a short paragraph was bound to cause some problems.
I think I'll tread carefully around the subject...the more you learn, the less you realise you know! :x
What do you think of the little metal plugs in Ruth's initial photo? I've never thought of having these vases (or perhaps candleholders) upside down - do you think that was the intention?
xxx Max
tmaritta:
--- Quote from: "Max" ---
What do you think of the little metal plugs in Ruth's initial photo? I've never thought of having these vases (or perhaps candleholders) upside down - do you think that was the intention?
--- End quote ---
I think the intention may have been that the object can be used both as a vase and a candle holder. Quite clever, isn't it?
TMaritta
Glassyone:
Here is a comparision. One, one way up and the other, the other.
I'm very grateful for all the information and discussion.
One last point is that the label was placed such that it would be read downwards from the one on the right! That suggests that the labeller regarded the ' bowl' as going at the top.
http://tinypic.com/fokpig.jpg Mod: Link dead
Cheers Ruth
:?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version