Glass Identification - Post here for all ID requests > Glass Animals & Figurines

Langham or not??? - ID = L Zanetti

<< < (2/6) > >>

rosieposie:
Firstly, I just want to say thank you for all the help that is coming through.... :kissy:

LG is Liskeard Glass so you are correct there John.

I did let the seller know these were Neodymium glass and not iridescent, and as you say, not a usual for Langham.

I collect Langham in bucketfulls, and the base is either blank, or has Langham England acid etched on the base.  Much older pieces have the Langham Glass Blower logo acid etched to the base.
Langham labels are sometimes present if they haven't got worn or washed off and are of the glassblower on a black rectangle and a Union Flag.

The only artist signed pieces I have seen are those of Paul Miller ( Of which I am an avid collector). His signature takes two forms.....the older more deliberate writing....quite childish to look at, and the more up to date gentle script.....flowing and often difficult to see as it is very lightly written.

So I feel I really do know my Langham Glass and would love to know if anyone out there knows who made these....I TRULY don't think they are British glass....I would guess Murano or Scandinavian....please  help???

Lustrousstone:
The duck and the dog both look Murano-ish. I suggest the sigs are previous owners

Hourglass:
My sincere apollogy, I was confusing the issue. LG anogram embossed on pontil is Liskeard glass and not Langham. Langham were marked on the base with an engraved name and later ones I believe had a stuck on label, or were all labelled as well as engraved?

TxSilver:
The duck sig looks like Zanetti L -- Licio Zanetti. It looks like Zanetti's work, too.

A few minutes later: I checked again to make sure. Definitely Zanetti.

TxSilver:
I checked the dog. It also looks like Licio Zanetti. I read that about the dog sig being posted to the duck. That's likely to confuse some people. I don't know who did the tweety bird. I've seen them a lot, but haven't paid much attention to them. They're cute, but I don't think one could consider them a masterpiece.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page