Craig I looked through Frederick Carders Steuben Glass, Ketchum #1 which has the line drawings for 1402, no dimensions given & while I agree there one can expect variations in hand blown glass I would say that in this case you are correct in saying this piece should be examined in hand for a positive attribution. I know your gut says Steuben, mine says maybe, but AA Seguso is a prime candidate because I am aware of the situation that existed years ago when these appeared & were snapped up for the dremel trade. They (bowls, vases,colognes) were found in both Jade & Roseline & the shapes (with exception of the larger atomizers) were obviously carefully created to mimic the originals & that’s why I hesitate. Also with a piece in a color this highly prized I would be more inclined to find a signature rather than not that I could compare to an original. Maybe I’m being too skeptical, but a great many people were taken in by these pieces over a two year span. There was also a problem with Calcite during this period produced by Poschinger, however the shapes were usually a bit far off. If you like Steuben there is a Diving Lady frog I IDed Monday evening for an individual that is currently on the bay (he had it originally listed a a hood ornament & promptly changed the listing) My good deed for the month. Ken