Topic: Jubilee jug

[Leni]

Hi Leni are you sure its not W/Fs

I thought so in the first place, John, but I posted it on Isit? and Steve (R) said no.   Perhaps I should take it and show it to Ray? 

And I think Adam is right about it being sandblasting, not etching or a transfer print or whatever.   

[johnphilip]

 I am not saying it is W/Fs but Ray will tell you in a flash, saves a lot of work.

[Leni]

Thanks, John.  I'll pop round to him some time 

[Anne]

Leni, did you ever get an answer on this ID?

[johnphilip]

Well i do now know its not W/Fs for sure .

[Leni]

Well i do now know its not W/Fs for sure .

I know that too now   Never did get an ID, but familiarity with WF colours over time has convinced me this isn't, even if anything like it could be found in a WF catalogue.  I wouldn't even be thinking WF if I saw this today!     The amber colour is much too dark and 'toffee' coloured.  WF is far more 'golden syrup'   

I did wonder for a while about Webb, but I hadn't even considered Czech glass at the time when I bought it! 

So still unidentified, I'm afraid!  Never mind, perhaps we shall see some more like it this year, for the next jubilee  :24: