The following observations might be of interest in this canine versus feline debate.
The 1990 Wordsworth re-print of the larger of the two Silber & Fleming catalogues/books (published originally some time in the 1880's) illustrates some of the items discussed here.
S. & F. didn't provide manufacturer attribution for individual items, although it's known that their catalogues included imported as well as British made tableware, glassware etc. Presumably all of these dog and cat items shown in S. & F. will be from Davidson only - the date of the Davidson catalogue (1878 - 1888) coincides with the publication date of the S. & F. catalogue, and the Inwald items weren't made until c. 1914. Since none of the above links includes an Inwald cat-handled creamer, it appears this was a Davidson only design - correct me if I'm wrong please.
In the S. & F. catalogue the twin dog handled item is shown in two forms - with, and without the lid. Without the lid, but with rudimentary stem and scalloped/splayed foot it's described as a sugar basin. With a cat finial lid, scalloped/splayed foot, but no stem, it's described as Butter Dish and Cover, and as said both of these designs will presumably be Davidson pieces.
The S. & F. catalogue also includes what appears to be the Davidson creamer No. 26, and the illustration shows a handle that is definitely modelled on a cat........... high arched back, with feline shaped head, and this matches the shape of the handle of Fred's creamer. Looking at the above link from Sid which shows a drawing from the Davidson catalogue, there's no doubt that in the drawing of the creamer, the cat has been airbrushed to look like a dog - the back has been lowered and the shape of the head changed - perhaps dogs sold better than cats - and it appears this same drawing is repeated in Pressglas-correspondenz.
A comparison, showing the difference between feline and canine handle shape - on the creamer - is seen more easily in the Pressglas-korrespondenz - page 82 showing the re-modelled 'dog', and page 83 showing the cat shape as per the handle on Fred's creamer.
Roy's worry that the sugar is missing its lid, seems to be unfounded (as far as Davidson is concerned) - certainly an open sugar without lid, with rudimentary stem and splayed foot exists legitimately from Davidson only, as shown in the above links and the S. & F. catalogue - provided Roy can tell the difference between the Davidson and Inwald designs, since the latter appears NOT to have been made without a lid.

Much of the above is obvious from the links provided so apologies if it seems boring, but just thought it might be useful to draw attention to the fact that S. & F. were illustrating Davidson production - and that their creamer was modelled with a cat and not a dog.
Do people think that the pieces shown in that 1880's catalogue were indeed Davidson production?
Feel free to criticise or comment
