No-one likes general adverts, and ours hadn't been updated for ages, so we're having a clear-out and a change round to make the new ones useful to you. These new adverts bring in a small amount to help pay for the board and keep it free for you to use, so please do use them whenever you can, Let our links help you find great books on glass or a new piece for your collection. Thank you for supporting the Board.

Author Topic: Early Studio Glass, probably British ?  (Read 758 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Steve S

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 9
  • New Member Thanks for spending time on my posts
    • Czech, Mdina, Whitefriars
    • United Kingdom
Early Studio Glass, probably British ?
« on: December 03, 2015, 11:00:04 AM »
I have recently acquired this interesting looking example of  a squarish vase with strong black and red swirls. It came from a seller on that most famous of auction sites, who is selling off an estate of early British Studio glass from part of a collection made in the 1960s and 1970s. The vendor has no information regarding the vase other than the feeling that it it was an early piece.
It is 13.5 cm high and has a broken pontil mark to the base. It is quite primitive looking in its execution but is striking and a bit unusual. I like it!
However it is frustrating to have absolutely no idea from where it may have originated.

Support the Glass Message Board by finding a book via book-seek.com


Offline Gowdod

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 260
Re: Early Studio Glass, probably British ?
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2015, 08:07:45 PM »
Dear Steve,

it has a George Elliott feel about it; may we see picture of the pontil. I assume no fine signature marks to the base?

With kind regards

Andrew

Support the Glass Message Board by finding glass through glass-seek.com


Offline Steve S

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 9
  • New Member Thanks for spending time on my posts
    • Czech, Mdina, Whitefriars
    • United Kingdom
Re: Early Studio Glass, probably British ?
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2015, 05:12:39 PM »
Hi Andrew,
Definitely no signatures. See pics of broken pontil mark below. There seems to be a square impression there but I guess this is just a mark from the end of the iron rod.

Steve

Support the Glass Message Board by finding a book via book-seek.com


 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
Visit the Glass Encyclopedia
link to glass encyclopedia
Visit the Online Glass Museum
link to glass museum


This website is provided by Angela Bowey, PO Box 113, Paihia 0247, New Zealand