Glass Discussion & Research. NO IDENTIFICATION REQUESTS here please. > Bohemia, Czechoslovakia, Czech Republic, Austria

Help With ID for Pair of Hanau Silver Mounted Bohemian Specimen Vases Please

<< < (2/4) > >>

APEXantiques:
So you can accurately compare
Note the difference in punch shapes, the lack of detail on the vase punches, even the way the area around the lion or leopard head is raised on the vase but punched in as one would expect on the example mark. The most important detail is the punch shape however. These changed with the year just like date letters did and are considered an extra layer of security when read in combination with the date letters.

Ekimp:
I’m aware that the punch shape changed (presumably you’re referring to the shield shape). Observing purely from the supplied photograph of your rim, the shapes of the shields were made with the same shaped punches as for your clearer example in the latest photograph.

I believe the differences you see are due to the rim of your vase being such a very thin gauge of metal. The thin metal wouldn’t take the impression from the punch as well as something more solid, plus it is more likely to loose definition due to wear and minor denting. If you look at other similar thin rims you will see the hallmarks affected in the same way. Below is an eBay link to an example of Birmingham hallmarks with similar “raised” areas you mention.

We can agree to disagree :) It might be worth enquiring about the hallmark on specialist silver forums, it would be interesting to hear what they say.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/196260539106?itmmeta=01HRFM605SQEYT8ZWS97S9KAWD&hash=item2db20a2ae2:g:KkUAAOSwQudl2NDx&itmprp=enc%3AAQAIAAAA0KlmQ0Jage5rmLU47k3euhrYR8E2VG%2F25BMy%2Bd7PJ8XJPkTRHH4k8%2B3yo7DsiWDjBLoX3f9LrpCmoxeVmSNiiVHqQqv3S2bTKU1tyg0mxJ3ZhdqRPFSOF1RQgsMsgL%2B9TJEDmSUg5VEJh3KKwTNYGm8IbGmTWifMSqtiIlUz5CGp5IKi56%2FdoxVLgll%2BGp4hFHtQX1b6ZEXeFWn4EwbJLATQO%2FQHD9QkwKsKuz5N4p%2FSlZeMnng4vxnhuZe2PGqoty7nK28DvdetQKaD9L9fLTM%3D%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR4CDmPTDYw

APEXantiques:
I have been involved in trading silver for almost 20 years (Sheesh, scary!!! First time I've ever worked out how long I've been at it) and am beyond familiar with the English Hallmarking system and (though I live to learn) would be shocked if these were genuine English hallmarks for any year.
Firstly, you'll note that all three punches on the example are the same shape (outline), this is not the case with the vase.
For example, If you look at the leopards head for example, notice how on the example the punch is only pointed at the bottom & has an "m" like shape at the top? On the vase, it is pointed at both the top and the bottom. Each of the punches has similar inaccuracies.
I posted here as I was hoping someone would have specific knowledge of whomever may have been making these kinds of vases &/or the company that may have been mounting these kinds of vases (specifically). Alas I think I was aiming a bit high with the kind of information I sought.
Additionally, there is no registered makers mark that matches the mark on the vase.

NevB:
My mistake on the lion rampant, I assume you mean lion GARDANT. As for the vase itself it is difficult to attribute a specific maker, there were several who made this sort of thing, it's not a shape I've seen before. A few examples here.

https://www.thegildedcurio.com/

APEXantiques:
Unfortunately atrocious spelling comes with the territory growing up with ADHD (now growing old with it!!).
So we are in agreement that they were in all likelihood made in Bohemia towards the latter part of the 19th or very early 20th Centuries correct?
As it happens, technically we were both wrong about the lion... Despite what the hallmark literature says, it is actually a lion Passant. Passant, Gaurdant, Regardant refers to the position of the lions head (Front, side...as in looking at the viewer and back... looking towards it's tail respectively). That's all without even touching on the position of the lions feet!
This kind of reinforces my point (VERY loosely) ... Even though not immediately apparent, it's the the very minor details like the combination of font, case, punch shape etc that confirms the validity of a mark in the English Hallmarking system. If just one of those things on one of the punches is not correct, it invalidates the mark entirely.
It really is an ingenious system, almost like the 1500's version of 2 factor authentication for Sterling Silver. I guess at the time it was instituted, silver was still regarded as money so they needed a system as watertight and foolproof as minting a coin for authenticating and certifying it's authenticity.
Gone are the days that the word Money & the word Silver are synonymous unfortunately. Most people these days would have no idea that £1-  (1 Pound Sterling) actually represented One (troy) Pound of .925 (92.5% Pure) Silver and that each division thereof (6d, Shilling, Florin etc) was a division of the weight of that Pound of silver. (20 Shillings, 40 6d or 10 Florins in fact!).
Anyway, I'm off topic now!!!

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page