Author Topic: Chance - Sights of London (Read 9963 times)

Max · « **Reply #10 on:** November 28, 2006, 02:16:13 PM »

Quote from: "Pip"

Update: with regard to the Seriesware London scenes - I've got the Beefeater and the Policeman :-) .... so if anyone spots any of the others for sale I'd be grateful if you'd give me the nod (assuming you don't want them yourself of course).

Ah. I have two buses. Perhaps we can come to an arrangement, think they only cost about a fiver each.

btw I was trying to get a set going too (forgot I already had the bus!)...we'll have to watch out for each other bidding!

Pip · « **Reply #11 on:** November 28, 2006, 02:27:22 PM »

Quote from: "Max"

Ah. I have two buses. Perhaps we can come to an arrangement, think they only cost about a fiver each.

btw I was trying to get a set going too (forgot I already had the bus!)...we'll have to watch out for each other bidding!

Gosh were you? I didn't realise Max - well we can watch out for each other and make sure we let each other know what the other is doing - I don't mind how long it takes me to get my set together. What other ones have you got already BTW?

Oh and yes please - I'd love to buy one of your buses off you - let me know how much you want for it :-)

Lustrousstone · « **Reply #12 on:** December 02, 2006, 02:41:31 PM »

I now have a boxed (somewhat tatty) and labelled union flag see here

Frank · « **Reply #13 on:** December 02, 2006, 03:12:22 PM »

As the jack is incorrectly drawn, perhaps it is not really a Chance piece? If it is how embarrasing that they didn't know the rules for drawing the jack!

David E · « **Reply #14 on:** December 02, 2006, 03:12:31 PM »

Excellent, thanks Christine. Thought I'd be struggling to get examples, but have a few now

David E · « **Reply #15 on:** December 02, 2006, 03:14:05 PM »

Quote from: "Frank"

As the jack is incorrectly drawn, perhaps it is not really a Chance piece? If it is how embarrasing that they didn't know the rules for drawing the jack!

Ah, I was going to question that - wasn't sure without checking. However, it could simply be that they've stuck the label on the wrong side :wink:

David E · « **Reply #16 on:** December 02, 2006, 03:15:59 PM »

Correction: just checked and it is right - the shape isn't, of course, but difficult to portray on a square dish :wink:

Frank · « **Reply #17 on:** December 02, 2006, 03:33:06 PM »

The diagonal crosses must not have a right angle in the centre. If adapting the shape is allowed, that is still not and is considered an important point.

Lustrousstone · « **Reply #18 on:** December 02, 2006, 03:44:02 PM »

O'er missis, we can't write and complain. I only took the photo guv (Well actually OH did, mine had too many reflections) There's a nugget for the book then

Max · « **Reply #19 on:** December 02, 2006, 03:47:05 PM »

I was wondering why it wasn't correct too...

http://www.jdawiseman.com/papers/union-jack/union-jack.html