Glass Message Board
Glass Identification - Post here for all ID requests => Glass => Topic started by: uphoosier on July 19, 2007, 09:08:15 PM
-
I can't find any indication that Kralik ever signed a piece in this manner. Assuming a previous owner etched the name on to remind him of what it was, was he correct? It is 10" tall. The finish is iridescent. The white design is trailed - it is on, not in the red. All opinions are appreciated. Thanks for looking.
Ken
http://glassgallery.yobunny.org.uk/displayimage.php?pos=-7954 (http://glassgallery.yobunny.org.uk/displayimage.php?pos=-7954)
http://glassgallery.yobunny.org.uk/displayimage.php?pos=-7953 (http://glassgallery.yobunny.org.uk/displayimage.php?pos=-7953)
http://glassgallery.yobunny.org.uk/displayimage.php?pos=-7952 (http://glassgallery.yobunny.org.uk/displayimage.php?pos=-7952)
-
Hi Ken,
Take a look here, where there is an example of a Kralik signature:Mod: Link removed as content changed to inappropriate site
-
Hi,
Be careful, neither Ken's item mark, or the signature in Della's link look consistent with the period.. The link one looks like a dremel job. If it were copper-wheel engraved, I would expect it to show better definition. (Sorry Brian, when you say contemporary, do you mean our era?)
Kralik were known to use an acid-etched mark of Tcheco-slovaquie, in an oval, for serious pieces, and I would be expecting to see that mark and or a diamond pen signature. Signing using a diamond pen would surely bring a better defined mark. Production items, such as Della's recent iridised water service probably would have only carried a paper label.
I have my doubts, but what would I know?
Respectfully,
Marcus
-
I was pretty certain the mark was not real Kralik. So, forgetting the mark, what might the vase be?
-
I would suspect Makora, Poland.