Glass Message Board

Glass Identification - Post here for all ID requests => Glass => Topic started by: kazleeb on October 05, 2009, 08:38:49 PM

Title: czech vase? - ID = Chřibská
Post by: kazleeb on October 05, 2009, 08:38:49 PM
hi,this is a green,pink and clear vase very heavy,its 13inch high and 9 1/2 wide,thanks kaz
Title: Re: czech vase?
Post by: jonchellycain on October 05, 2009, 08:46:32 PM
Hi there
yep chribska too, not 100% on designer but i think its Hospodka
michelle
Title: Re: czech vase?
Post by: kazleeb on October 05, 2009, 08:50:43 PM
thanks again will have to keep lee out of her house she told me to go and look at her murano in her front room and i said i thought it was czech,im just abot to put something really big on loverly on here,kaz
Title: Re: czech vase?
Post by: Jindra8526 on October 06, 2009, 07:51:31 AM
This is Chřibská, 372/1 - attributed to Josef Hospodka.

Jindrich
Title: Re: czech vase? - ID = Chřibská, attributed to Josef Hospodka.
Post by: kazleeb on October 06, 2009, 01:34:28 PM
thanks sadly these are not mine,kaz
Title: Re: czech vase? - ID = Chřibská, attributed to Josef Hospodka.
Post by: Sklounion on October 06, 2009, 05:32:56 PM
Hi, Jindrich,

Is the attribution merely that, an attribution, not a definitive ID?

Given that the following are definite IDs:

Starosta: "Bratislava 79", pattern number 380, "Moscow 80", 381." "Opava", 382, "Věra", 383, "Marie", 384, "Hana", 385, "Ilona", 387, "Dana", 388, "Květa", 389, "Eva", 390,  "Jana", 391,  "Zuzana", 392,  why is a Starosta attribution, not the more likely?

Does not this call into question a Hospodka attribution, based on pattern number 372? Clearly we are talking of designs from the  late 1970s and early 80s, at this point, where Hospodka was heavily involved with his pedagogic activities.....

Respectfully,

M
Title: Re: czech vase? - ID = Chřibská, attributed to Josef Hospodka.
Post by: Jindra8526 on October 07, 2009, 06:45:45 AM
Hi Marcus,
you are true, all this free hand shaped glass pieces are usually not correctly attributed to Hospodka (and/or his followers - nonamed).

The catalogues that I have does not give any other name of designer what perhaps is correct. There is nothing very inventional or special in individual designs, it is quite difficult to distinguish patterns becouse differences are really very small. To speak about "design" in sense of this word we use to understand in such type of glass gives me no sense.

Moreover, we can find many other Chřibká pieces fabricated recently by Rubin Glass or Egermann s.r.o. - some very simmilar to old ones, some a bit different, it brings chaos into my system what I dislike. Chřibská, even should be described the best we can, is for the moment not subject of any deeper research for me. Perhaps later.

Jindrich