Glass Message Board

Glass Discussion & Research. NO IDENTIFICATION REQUESTS here please. => British & Irish Glass => Topic started by: Lustrousstone on January 09, 2011, 08:18:45 PM

Title: Scottish, but Vasart or Monart mushroom posy. ID = Nazeing (English)
Post by: Lustrousstone on January 09, 2011, 08:18:45 PM
I'm pretty confident this is Scottish, but is it Monart or Vasart. It's just over 5 in diameter and has a shallow, highly polished button pontil mark. It looks like Monart shape IK size IX. The green is a nice rich colour.
Title: Re: Scottish, but Vasart or Monart mushroom posy
Post by: johnphilip on January 09, 2011, 08:31:13 PM
If not , possibly Nazeing ?
Title: Re: Scottish, but Vasart or Monart mushroom posy
Post by: Gary on January 09, 2011, 09:17:18 PM
Definitely not Monart, as the pontil  is to roughly finished off. Nazeing seems like a good call.
Gary
Title: Re: Scottish, but Vasart or Monart mushroom posy
Post by: Lustrousstone on January 09, 2011, 10:31:23 PM
The pontil is not roughly finished. It is a slightly raised highly polished button; what you can see is a swirl of white, not rough grinding or a snapped pontil. And there is some base grinding. I'll try to take a better shot.
Title: Re: Scottish, but Vasart or Monart mushroom posy
Post by: Frank on January 10, 2011, 12:57:05 AM
Not Scottish, I forget what latest thoughts on these were, perhaps Nigel will remember!
Title: Re: Scottish, but Vasart or Monart mushroom posy
Post by: Lustrousstone on January 10, 2011, 07:24:19 AM
OK, that's fine. Thank you
Title: Re: Scottish, but Vasart or Monart mushroom posy
Post by: Lustrousstone on January 11, 2011, 12:18:42 PM
One more question. What makes it not Scottish? The shape matches IK. The size is close enough to IX. The pontil mark matches some of those described for Monart, i.e., a raised polished mark with some additional base grinding. Is it the colour?
Title: Re: Scottish, but Vasart or Monart mushroom posy
Post by: chopin-liszt on January 11, 2011, 12:45:50 PM
It's the colour but most of all, how it "works".
This shape is very, very common for "whoever made this", not so common for Monart or Vasart.

What's been keeping me from saying nay to Monart or Vasart out loud, or suggesting anything else, is I'm a bit thrown by the polished blob over the pontil mark, and I'm not able to positively id. Nazeing and I think we need Nigel or Frank.
(I get tangled with Nazeing, Grey-Stan and the so-far unidentified maker, then I found S&W did similar and, I'm sure, somebody else - so I'm keeping quiet.)
Title: Re: Scottish, but Vasart or Monart mushroom posy
Post by: johnphilip on January 11, 2011, 03:05:38 PM
After seeing the better shots of the pontil i am more confused as that does look Monartish . :huh:
Title: Re: Scottish, but Vasart or Monart mushroom posy
Post by: Lustrousstone on January 11, 2011, 08:11:01 PM
The polished blob is the pontil mark. It's like one of the rough ground Vasart buttons that has been more finely ground. I'm not bothered what it is. It was £2 worth of cute that I hoped to ID.
Title: Re: Scottish, but Vasart or Monart mushroom posy
Post by: chopin-liszt on January 12, 2011, 01:12:05 PM
 ;D

It certainly is £2 worth - and I'm sure a maker will eventually be found. The large well-polished blob/mark is what is really throwing me. It's very "Monart".
Title: Re: Scottish, but Vasart or Monart mushroom posy
Post by: Lustrousstone on January 12, 2011, 03:56:14 PM
The blob isn't as wide as it looks
http://www.ysartglass.com/Moncat/Page12.htm
The base is a bit like example 3, except the rim is only partly ground
http://www.ysartglass.com/Ysart/IDguide1.htm
Title: Re: Scottish, but Vasart or Monart mushroom posy
Post by: nigel benson on January 12, 2011, 09:58:04 PM
Hmmmm,

Pre-war Nazeing 'Posy Bowl' 5" diameter. Nothing to do with Scotland I'm afraid ;)

5", 7 1/2", 10", 12", 14" in the catalogue pages. Much more latitude wioth Nazeing than mMonart when it comnes to size IMHO.

Nigel
Title: Re: Scottish, but Vasart or Monart mushroom posy
Post by: Lustrousstone on January 13, 2011, 07:33:39 AM
Thanks Nigel