Glass Message Board
Glass Discussion & Research. NO IDENTIFICATION REQUESTS here please. => British & Irish Glass => Topic started by: speckledjim on March 17, 2011, 11:45:41 AM
-
Does anyone have the RSW numbers (eg. RSW 25 etc.) for Kings Lynn and Wedgwood's glass vases please?
I'm particularly interested in the numbers for the Lunar/Moon Crater, Textured, Snowflake and Cylinder range of vases and the bottle shaped decanter produced from around 1967.
-
From Susan Tobins excellent book. Cylinder vase - small narrower version RSW 20/1 medium RSW 20/2, large RSW 20/3 (page 65 illustration)
from Ronald Stennett Willson website ;Cylinder vases: RSW20 7.5inch: RSW20/1 9 inch: RSW20/2 10 inch: RSW20/3
But unfortunately that is all I can find. The moon crater and Snowflake vases are listed only by name as you have them .
As to "Textured" and the decanter - there are a number of "bottle "shaped decanters. If you can post a photo I will see if I can match it with one in the book. The same for the textured vase.
JAK
-
Thanks Jakgene - here's the two images of the Textured and Bottle vases - They are about 8" high.
-
The decanter looks like an RSW 43 without its stopper. Stopper was cork shaped, flat topped, with 2 small bubbles with a larger flat bubble in between them - similar to the domed paperweights. it came in clear, blue or topaz. Size not given. photo on p 23 of Susan Tobins book.
Mods - am I allowed to photograph the book page and post the picture if it is accredited to ST's book? or would that be a breach of copyright?
cannot see the textured one yet - will keep looking
JAK
-
RSW 626 is listed as a textured vase 8.25 inches made in clear, blue, topaz or green. no photo though. This is the only one listed that I can see where size and colour match - so may be it.
Sorry can't be of more help.
off to beddy byes now :sleep:
JAK
-
Wow - Thats excellent Jakgene - you pretty much answer all my enquiries. Have a good night.
Regards
-
Hi Jak, it would be a breach of copyright and board policy, but thanks for asking. :thup:
-
Thanks Anne, that's what I thought - and why I didn't do it - but one picture could clarify so easily Sigh!
regards
JAK