Glass Message Board

Glass Identification - Post here for all ID requests => Glass => Unresolved Glass Queries => Topic started by: colink on May 04, 2011, 06:57:18 PM

Title: Glass id required please
Post by: colink on May 04, 2011, 06:57:18 PM

One that Gail bought the other week but have no idea as to who when and where it was made any help gratefully received.  :thup: :thup:
http://i984.photobucket.com/albums/ae327/colink_photos/Carnival%20glass/DSC01267.jpg

Title: Re: Glass id required please
Post by: pamela on May 04, 2011, 08:06:32 PM

Hi Colin,
maker still unknown, I'm afraid. I've got several of these in different sizes, with and without lustre...

 unknown bowls  (http://pressglas-pavillon.de/schalen/00835.html)

 ::)

Title: Re: Glass id required please
Post by: Anne on May 04, 2011, 10:37:07 PM

Is yours iridescent Colin?

Title: Re: Glass id required please
Post by: fattystratty1 on May 04, 2011, 10:56:40 PM

I've found the pattern in my carnival glass 7th edition. They call the pattern Petals and Prisms. The pattern is said to be all exterior, comes in a collar based sugar bowl, stemmed sugar, a creamer, a 9"bowl, and a large 10" bowel.It is not mentioned what factory or country the bowls come from. I tried to cross ref the pattern on Dotty's site but could not find it .

Title: Re: Glass id required please
Post by: colink on May 05, 2011, 06:35:01 AM

Quote from: Anne on May 04, 2011, 10:37:07 PM

Is yours iridescent Colin?

Anne it does have a little but as can be seen a bit brown Gail likes it anyway  :thup: :thup:

Title: Re: Glass id required please
Post by: Lustrousstone on May 05, 2011, 08:16:00 AM

Yours is iridescent Colin. Here's my sugar bowl and large bowl as a centrepiece. http://lustrousstone.co.uk/cpg/displayimage.php?pid=615
Glen's theory is Rindskopf, but it's only a theory.

Title: Re: Glass id required please
Post by: colink on May 05, 2011, 11:53:43 AM

Many thanks for the replies  :thup: :thup:

Title: Re: Glass id required please
Post by: Anne on May 06, 2011, 12:15:53 AM

Ah Christine, that's why it looked familiar! :)