Kevin — It's not Vesta Venetian. You are making it quite tough for anyone kind enough to look it up for you. Please include:
Whether it is lightly vertically ribbed, and if so how many ribs (18, perhaps?),Whether it is iridised (like Okra and Loetz) or not, and some indication of the strength of the iridescence,Rim diameter, overall diameter, foot diameter, height,Weight (can sometimes be useful but not essential),An exact transcription of the mark.As all measurements in original Walsh source material are imperial (they closed in 1951), inch measurements are preferable, but metric measurements are acceptable. Walsh rarely used eighth of an inch sizes. so keep to the nearest quarter of an inch, noting any exact measurements. If you aren't happy with fractions give us metric to the nearest millimetre. If you aren't happy with measuring, get someone else to check your figures.
Bernard C. 8)
Kevin — Here's a classic example of Walsh mother of pearl Vesta Venetian (http://www.fieldingsauctioneers.co.uk/resultsLotDetails.asp?lotsID=75189&menuItemOn=2&salesID=110&hasImage=1) at Fieldings, the Stourbridge auctioneers. Their description is slightly misleading as it is obvious they hadn't worked out how it was made. Most examples claiming to be Vesta Venetian on the net are not Vesta Venetian, including at least one museum example. Many of these misattributions are down to me, as I accepted without question Reynolds' attribution of the lidded jar at Plate 15 (ii), which turned out to be postwar Empoli after labelled examples emerged. All the Vesta Venetian examples in Gulliver are OK, as are all the other examples in Reynolds, but again their descriptions show that they hadn't worked out how it was made.
I'm only interested in an accurate rib count. It could be 14, 15, 16 or 18. I'm fairly certain Walsh never used a 17-rib dip mould, but anything is possible.
While browsing around the net I noticed my words quoted extensively on the Australian Collectors Weekly forum here (http://www.collectorsweekly.com/stories/51843-john-walsh-walsh-iridescent-bowl-a4614?in=1268), without permission and without my copyright notice. You started off well, with a few words of summary and a link, but that's as far as you can go without committing copyright theft. You can include as many links as you wish, to individual posts if you think it appropriate. Please will you delete my words and change them to links (or, if necessary, get a Collectors Weekly forum moderator to do it for you). Here's the main link you need:
http://www.glassmessages.com/index.php/topic,46968.msg264179.html#msg264179See topic ADMIN: Using Copyright Material (http://www.glassmessages.com/index.php/topic,24434.0.html).
Bernard C. 8)