Glass Message Board

Glass Identification - Post here for all ID requests => Glass => Topic started by: NMott on December 10, 2012, 02:15:49 PM

Title: Heavy lobed glass vase - Daum?
Post by: NMott on December 10, 2012, 02:15:49 PM
Heavy glass vase with interlocking lobes around the top and bottom.
Polished pontil mark on the base with a lot of wear around it.
6" high.
Unsigned.


Title: Re: Heavy lobed glass vase - Daum?
Post by: Ivo on December 10, 2012, 03:12:45 PM
Definitely not Daum which is always signed and in a class of its own. But perhaps from Art Vannes, or from VSL, or made under the Sèvres brand.
Title: Re: Heavy lobed glass vase - Daum?
Post by: NMott on December 10, 2012, 04:35:40 PM
Many thanks   :) I'll check those out.
Title: Re: Heavy lobed glass vase - Daum?
Post by: NMott on December 10, 2012, 04:56:29 PM
VSL vases seem to come closest to my one.
Title: Re: Heavy lobed glass vase - Daum?
Post by: astrid on December 14, 2012, 06:12:35 AM
I know this one for sure, it's by Val St. Lambert, 1960s, the designer is Antonio Guido Bon.

This is another one of his from the same period:

Title: Re: Heavy lobed glass vase - Daum?
Post by: NMott on December 14, 2012, 11:21:45 PM
Cheers.  ;D
Title: Re: Heavy lobed glass vase - Daum?
Post by: John Smith on December 14, 2012, 11:27:16 PM
With respect, I agree with IVO. Very Whitefriars though... but not my field.
Title: Re: Heavy lobed glass vase - Daum?
Post by: John Smith on December 14, 2012, 11:35:31 PM
.... Ivo My friend... Not all DAUM glass is singed. With respect.
Title: Re: Heavy lobed glass vase - Daum?
Post by: flying free on December 14, 2012, 11:44:37 PM
I know very little, but I thought Daum is mostly signed though, and I suppose it depends on what - isn't their clear stuff always signed?  I do have two Daum Jades bowls that aren't signed admittedly.
m
Title: Re: Heavy lobed glass vase - Daum?
Post by: NMott on December 28, 2012, 06:37:00 PM
I have a green bubble vase which is very similar to a Daum one I've found online, but unsigned. The rim is a bit irregular, and the foot isn't as good as the signed one, so maybe it's unsigned because it's a second or a trial piece.