Glass Message Board

Glass Identification - Post here for all ID requests => Glass Paperweights => Topic started by: cubby01 on February 14, 2013, 05:47:26 PM

Title: What do we call this millefiori paperweight style ...
Post by: cubby01 on February 14, 2013, 05:47:26 PM
...where the murrines are not encased in glass but are on the surface like this one.

I bought this in a local auction house.  Is it Murano?  Age?  I want to gift to someone that already has a few Murano millefiori pieces so would like to know if that's what it is first.

It's approx 2-3/4" wide and 2-1/4" tall.

Thanks,

Title: Re: What do we call this millefiori paperweight style ...
Post by: Lustrousstone on February 14, 2013, 06:57:15 PM
Also modern Chinese I think
Title: Re: What do we call this millefiori paperweight style ...
Post by: chopin-liszt on February 14, 2013, 07:03:32 PM
 :o
If it is, they really, really really are improving. I think it's rather lovely... for a pwt.
(but that's me not being a pwt afficionado)

But as to what is is called, I'm clueless. "Surface decorated", which applies to uncased vases etc. doen't quite seem right.

Murrine? (Mhurrine?) - There's a name for the Venetian vases made entirely from a jigsaw of canes in the surface...
Title: Re: What do we call this millefiori paperweight style ...
Post by: cubby01 on February 14, 2013, 07:50:44 PM
:o
If it is, they really, really really are improving.

Yes, it's very nice in person.   I am still doubtful this one is Chinese.   But I think I was wrong once ;D
Title: Re: What do we call this millefiori paperweight style ...
Post by: Wuff on February 14, 2013, 11:04:40 PM
I recognise some of these canes in the Effetre catalogue - which would make at least the canes Murano - but they are exported world wide.

It is actually a solid glass paperweight (deserving this name)? I own a couple of hollow glass balls plus several miniature bottles/vases - which I attribute to Livio Campanella (http://liviocampanella.com/component/option,com_frontpage/Itemid,1/lang,en/).

WARNING: my virus software tells me that the page is infected with "JS/Agent.480593"  .... don't click on the link unless you are sure your antivirus software is up-to-date!
Title: Re: What do we call this millefiori paperweight style ...
Post by: cubby01 on February 15, 2013, 01:09:17 AM
Thanks Wolf.   It is hollow.  It weighs about half what a similarly sized solid glass pwt weighs.   Still, at 7.75 oz (220g) I think it's heavy enough for a pwt.  It's nothing like the hollow hanging ornament type balls I've seen.   

I looked at a few of the Livio Campanella pieces (different site as my browser wouldn't let me in the one linked above).  Anyway, there were quite a few canes in common.  I realize that's not definitive but keeps it in the realm of likelihood.  -Buck
Title: Re: What do we call this millefiori paperweight style ...
Post by: KevinH on February 15, 2013, 02:39:43 PM
This weight is far neater than the surface decorated example (http://www.glassmessages.com/index.php/topic,51305.0.html) recently posted by member peteralba, which is currently thought to be very recent Chinese.

The canes (which I agree are Lefftre) are very well set, and even sit more closely than some of the vases by Livio Campanella. I suspect this is indeed a Campenella weight.
Title: Re: What do we call this millefiori paperweight style ...
Post by: chopin-liszt on February 15, 2013, 05:33:24 PM
The two weights are indeed very different - and Peteralba's one is definitely Heart Shop Foundation, current "new goods", first appeared last year. I keep a very close watch on the Heart Foundation Shops' new goods.

But we still haven't got any suggestions about how to describe an uncased millifiori wieght, which is the question posed!
Title: Re: What do we call this millefiori paperweight style ...
Post by: KevinH on February 16, 2013, 12:29:45 AM
"Surface decorated" is a usual description.
Title: Re: What do we call this millefiori paperweight style ...
Post by: paperweights on February 16, 2013, 02:05:10 AM
This is from Murano circa 1970.  It is not Chinese.