Glass Message Board

Glass Identification - Post here for all ID requests => Glass => Topic started by: bat20 on May 05, 2014, 10:58:52 AM

Title: uranium yellow opal 50's bowl??
Post by: bat20 on May 05, 2014, 10:58:52 AM
Hi all,last one of the bank holiday weekend and curiosity getting the better of me i think,it has wear to the outside of the base and is 11" wide with a very long low tone ring,i should also mention it has a ground flat rim with enamelled blue swallows and stars,lastly it glows green with the uv torch,i'm guessing Bohemian,any thoughts many thanks.
Title: Re: uranium yellow opal 50's bowl??
Post by: Lustrousstone on May 05, 2014, 01:38:46 PM
The swallow and the stars are transfers. The same stars are found on Chance items, so I would say your date is about right. It's not Bohemian, as that only takes us to 1918.

This pale yellow uncased uranium is not that common. I have four identified US pressed pieces ( 2 x Heisey in Ivorina verde c 1900, a Jefferson piece c 1905 and a Fenton piece c 1975, Fenton used it a lot but mostly frosted) and some Leerdam

And then I have these two mould-blown pieces, which I reckon are contemporaneous with yours and possibly the same manufacturer but I have no idea who made then
http://lustrousstone.co.uk/cpg/displayimage.php?pid=1427
http://lustrousstone.co.uk/cpg/displayimage.php?pid=2083
Title: Re: uranium yellow opal 50's bowl??
Post by: bat20 on May 05, 2014, 02:48:26 PM
Very interesting Christine,would the transfers have just been used in this country?When i picked it up i could see a faint hint of what i thought was a stamp,but on closer inspection when i got home it may just be just some foreign matter looking like tea dust faintly forming a triangle on the base.Lets hope a labelled example turns up soon.
Title: Re: uranium yellow opal 50's bowl??
Post by: Lustrousstone on May 05, 2014, 02:53:25 PM
There weren't that many transfer makers, so they could have been used anywhere

Quote
Lets hope a labelled example turns up soon.
Dream on!
Title: Re: uranium yellow opal 50's bowl??
Post by: bat20 on May 05, 2014, 09:19:57 PM
Is that a glass top to the rose bowl Christine?
Title: Re: uranium yellow opal 50's bowl??
Post by: Lustrousstone on May 06, 2014, 06:25:33 AM
No, most unusually it's Bakelite. I'll edit the caption to say so.
Title: Re: uranium yellow opal 50's bowl??
Post by: bat20 on May 06, 2014, 07:19:15 AM
I thought it might be,these pieces are very much of there time aren't they,i wonder if mine had a lid of some sort,i think it would balance the proportions up a bit.
Title: Re: uranium yellow opal 50's bowl??
Post by: flying free on May 09, 2014, 06:06:47 PM
I agree - as soon as I saw it I thought it was missing it's lid.
No idea whether the lid would have been glass or metal though.
m
Title: Re: uranium yellow opal 50's bowl??
Post by: Lustrousstone on May 09, 2014, 07:13:07 PM
No, it's too big to be lidded. It's fruit bowl size
Title: Re: uranium yellow opal 50's bowl??
Post by: flying free on May 09, 2014, 07:23:19 PM
oh yes, you're right ... odd shape though.  Would definitely look better with a lid  ;D
m
Title: Re: uranium yellow opal 50's bowl??
Post by: Lustrousstone on May 09, 2014, 07:44:55 PM
Sort of in the same class as this http://lustrousstone.co.uk/cpg/displayimage.php?pid=1163
Title: Re: uranium yellow opal 50's bowl??
Post by: flying free on May 09, 2014, 08:04:39 PM
yes definitely.  That looks as though it should have a silver plated lid with a knop or small loop handle  ;D
But, in real life does it look 'right'?  Often photographs don't seem to show how  'right'  a piece appears to the eye in real life  I find.
I've bought a bowl and removed the lid, because although it should have a lid it looks better on the eye without one  :)
Title: Re: uranium yellow opal 50's bowl??
Post by: Lustrousstone on May 09, 2014, 08:08:23 PM
It looks like it should be a lampshade in real life
Title: Re: uranium yellow opal 50's bowl??
Post by: flying free on May 09, 2014, 08:12:03 PM
yes I can see that - I often wonder if some molds/mold shapes were used for both?
m