Glass Message Board
Glass Discussion & Research. NO IDENTIFICATION REQUESTS here please. => British & Irish Glass => Topic started by: Paul S. on October 27, 2021, 01:28:17 PM
-
not see an example of rose-alabaster for a year or so, and they are so obvious when we do see them. For small grapefruit perhaps. ;) Three inches tall, and typically with the large but shallow polished pontil depression and the odd white speck. Meant to ask - does anyone have a good idea as to the date range for this colourway please?
-
It is the most stunning of their alabaster colours and I think that's because it's made with gold ruby. It's truly beautiful.
As far as I remember CH said the alabaster range was produced from 1916.
And I recall the green was produced into the 1930s.
In CH British Glass CH says on page 108 that the pink 'is the firm's 'rose-du-barry' while the white was their 'eau-de-nil'' when referring to a pink alabaster lidded vase in the group.
However in the Crystal Years, Williams-Thomas the pink is referred to as Rose (page 24).
And on the same page 24 Williams-Thomas says 'During the 1914 alabaster period, several colours - ....cinammon, rose ...- were all made.' indicating that it could have been produced from 1914.
My personal thoughts are that CH is probably right on the dating i.e. from 1916 but that the colour isn't their Rose-du-Barry as that seems to have been a shaded 'Burmese' type colour effect according to the Crystal Years book description of the colour.
Christine has given more detailed information on this pink colour already here in a previous thread:
https://www.glassmessages.com/index.php/topic,46591.msg263133.html#msg263133
The rose is made with gold ruby.
Date wise - The Crystal Years page 26 has a badly written sentence that could indicate the pink alabaster was made up to 1938. On the other hand the sentence might indicate that only the jade green alabaster was made up to 1938. It's confusingly written.
-
sincere thanks m for your essay - much appreciated, and reading back through your link it's apparent that I was involved in some of that wordy thread. I think that what prompted my question is best summed up in your final couple of sentences - thanks also to Christine for her input in that discussion - very helpful. These colours are very attractive, and I love to hold a piece like this that's probably been around since the inter war years - and survived without damage - until now.
I have owned pieces of this decor from S. & W. before, though they all went, and this is the first I've seen in recent times - quite what this particular shape would have been made for I've no idea.
thanks again. :)