No-one likes general adverts, and ours hadn't been updated for ages, so we're having a clear-out and a change round to make the new ones useful to you. These new adverts bring in a small amount to help pay for the board and keep it free for you to use, so please do use them whenever you can, Let our links help you find great books on glass or a new piece for your collection. Thank you for supporting the Board.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
British & Irish Glass / Royal Brierley England Mark
« Last post by mawfollett on June 01, 2025, 09:52:42 PM »
I recently bought a glass with "Royal Brierley England" in block capitals etched on the bottom. I have a few other pieces with just "Brierley" and "Royal Brierley" in block capitals etched on the bottom.

Can anyone shed any light on these marks?
62
Glass / Re: Uranium opaline gilded jewelled enamelled late 19th century vase
« Last post by flying free on June 01, 2025, 09:28:33 PM »
and a corrected link to the tea caddy I was referencing for shape:
https://onlineonly.christies.com/s/russian-art/silver-gilt-cloisonne-enamel-tea-caddy-88/91922

And bizarrely, now I copy and paste a pic of that tea caddy at Christie's and put it next to a pic of my 'vase', I feel my 'vase' might have had a lid like the tea caddy shown.  Hmmm.  The neck is indented on mine though and different to the silver version so perhaps that would indicate it was made as a vase in the shape of the Russian tea caddy?

Two more silver enamelled tea caddies, similar in shape but with a  flatter lid not domed:

a) https://www.bonhams.com/auction/24666/lot/103/a-silver-gilt-and-enamel-tea-caddy-antip-kuzmichev-moscow-before-1898-retailed-by-tiffany-and-co/
b)  https://www.1stdibs.com/jewelry/objets-dart-vertu/enamel-frames-objects/antip-kuzmichev-enamel-tea-caddy/id-j_68413/
63
Glass / Re: Cameo type glass or not ?
« Last post by flying free on June 01, 2025, 09:23:56 PM »
It might not have been cased completely to the top Ekimp.
There are other examples where the casing doesn't quite go to the top I think - I seem to remember wondering about why some pieces have a faint clear edge at the rim.
64
Thanks Tim for your continued help and interest.

I think it could be this one to which you refer?:
https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O4967/plate-thomas-hawkes/

This is such a lengthy thread with so much research yet no nearer establishing what exactly these 'topaz' finger bowls  (reported in the contemporary of the time report in The Mirror, which gave the list of items supplied for the banquet)  looked like. 

Nor from whence they originated.  Absolutely no evidence at all that they were made at Davenport.

I'm beginning to wonder if they really existed (newspaper report, word of mouth?? and printed verbatim??)... or ... long shot .... could they have been these Thomas Hawkes bowls perhaps and wrongly described in The Mirror report?

Thomas Hawkes of Dudley Flint Glassworks closed in 1843 during the depression - so it's most likely that bowl was made before 1843 and likely it could have been made for the Coronation banquet I think... if... it was made at Hawkes.  Again it seems from the V&A description that this is not verified.
Source: http://www.historywebsite.co.uk/articles/Dudley/glassw.htm


And if that is the case then who made these bowls (one each in the V&A and in The Corning):
here - stated by V&A as made at Davenport -
https://www.vam.ac.uk/blog/museum-life/seeing-more-glow-in-the-dark-glass


65
British & Irish Glass / Re: Greener fox covered sugar with grapes?!
« Last post by thewingedsphinx on June 01, 2025, 07:56:53 PM »
I’ve wondered what the lid looked like for years for this set as my father has a bowl without a lid and a creamer, so its good see this, (was this recently on eBay) it’s an uncommon unregistered pattern from Greener. I always thought it would have had an animal finial rather than grapes, but mosquitos explanation makes good sense. Both Davidson and Sowerby made similar with animal finials. It’s a rare find with the lid.
Thanks for sharing.
66
Glass / Re: Info on James Powell Topaz glass - "The Queen Victoria Topaz bowl"
« Last post by essi on June 01, 2025, 12:36:43 PM »
M, no mention of uranium glass here but
 in the book Victorian table glass and ornaments by Barbara Morris there is a photograph of an gold enamel plate which the caption says was probably made by Thomas Hawkes of Dudley
as part of a service used at the first reception for queen Victoria by the corporation of London after her coronation in 1837.
Not sure if you have seen this info before.
Tim
67
Glass / Re: Cameo type glass or not ?
« Last post by Ekimp on June 01, 2025, 08:11:38 AM »
Thanks for checking and getting back. I wonder how they achieved the clear band at the top, they have ground away the red overlay at some point, presumably after the hot work was finished. You would think they would’ve just ground the rim at the same time. Hope the new hobby doesn’t take much shelf space ;D
68
Glass / Re: Cameo type glass or not ?
« Last post by keith on May 31, 2025, 11:04:07 PM »
Fire polished, bit late answering, been obsessed with a new hobby !
69
Glass / Kingfisher starburst Bowl, ID pls.
« Last post by TimelessGlass on May 31, 2025, 06:45:55 AM »
Hi Folks,

This Reminds me of Dartington Palm bowls, Anita Harris, of which I no longer have.  It's as heavy as a Dartington piece, outer is textured, like my Dartington bowls.
Any ideas gratefully received.
Thankyou.
70
Glass / Re: Uranium opaline gilded jewelled enamelled late 19th century vase
« Last post by flying free on May 30, 2025, 09:08:06 PM »
See page 61 in the Moser book. Reminder to self - just wondering if it might have been by Moser?


chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.moser.com/file/edee/downloads/moser_book_eng.pdf
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
Visit the Glass Encyclopedia
link to glass encyclopedia
Visit the Online Glass Museum
link to glass museum


This website is provided by Angela Bowey, PO Box 113, Paihia 0247, New Zealand