just to correct an earlier quote...................."which he attributes to Richardson."........ absolute rubbish.........what I should have said was......."which is marked Richardson".
Good to hear you seem to have proof that this one is a Richardson piece.
Whether there were few, many, or any shapes that were peculiar to each factory only, and didn't overlap, I've no idea, but certainly from experience the depth of colour is known to be an influencing feature, often, when it comes to separating the two. If you have some known T/Webb amethyst, you can compare with this one and see if that comment holds true.