Hi, Jindrich,
Is the attribution merely that, an attribution, not a definitive ID?
Given that the following are definite IDs:
Starosta: "Bratislava 79", pattern number 380, "Moscow 80", 381." "Opava", 382, "Věra", 383, "Marie", 384, "Hana", 385, "Ilona", 387, "Dana", 388, "Květa", 389, "Eva", 390, "Jana", 391, "Zuzana", 392, why is a Starosta attribution, not the more likely?
Does not this call into question a Hospodka attribution, based on pattern number 372? Clearly we are talking of designs from the late 1970s and early 80s, at this point, where Hospodka was heavily involved with his pedagogic activities.....
Respectfully,
M