Leni — In my opinion more likely Walsh
Maypole, Rd No 484799 of August 11, 1906, illustrated PG October 1906, rather than the Stuart version. You have enough hooks, as these novelty centrepieces were capable of flexible configuration to suit the client's wishes. Your set, with four links, could have been configured maypole fashion for a round table, or in a line for a long table.
Now, the links. Both registration drawings show what appear to be glass? chains (I've not seen the PG reference). However Walsh certainly had a policy of continual improvement, and wouldn't have let a design registration stop them making modifications. For instance, do you recall my 323288 epergne with metal vase rings rather than the glass rings shown and described in the registration particulars? Reynolds 2001 illustrates an example in his collection with just two vases and one link, and says:-
... A modification, described in Pottery Gazette 1907, describes how the trails between the centre maypole and the outside posts were produced as coloured "ribbons". These ribbons appeared as coloured twist strands with a similarity to canes used in paperweights.
The link is a coloured twist rod, slightly curved to hang naturally, with a silver (or EPNS?) cap and loop on each end. It looks to me more like a double coloured twist wineglass stem with an inner white gauze and an outer double strand of green, rather than a paperweight cane. The total length of the link, including rings, is almost exactly twice the height of a satellite vase.
I believe there were three ex-Stuart glassmakers at the Ruskin Centre, Stourbridge making coloured twist stems, and they may still be there. You could check this with Broadfield House Glass Museum if you wanted to get links made.
Bernard C.