Sorry Chips, wasn't ignoring you, just didn't want to be 'shot down in flames' by those who know so much more than me :oops: :roll:
I, too, have seen feet like this on old stuff, but I agree that it looks a little bit too thick to be Victorian - I wouldn't think it was English, though I could be wrong.
A UV flashlight is fine for telling if it's uranium or similar reactive glass, but won't guarantee its age in any way. I'm puzzled as to why there is such a little bit of white at the very edges, but not apparently all round - or am I just not seeing it clearly? Is it meant to be a fine 'tape' round the edge?
Don't think it looks mould blown. The feet look to be 'crimped' or tooled in some way, but I agree they don't have enough wear as you would expect on an old piece. Of course, it could have stood in a display cabinet.
Pontil mark looks ok, but the scratches are a mystery. Can you look with a magnifying glass and see if there is any sign of them being later or contemporaneous (swallowed that dictionary again! :roll: )
I actually like it very much, anyway!
