thanks for the replies - and yes, it was a bootsale Andy - although i expect that by the time I have shoved tons of fossil fuel in the car, I dont suppose it was that cheap. Its just that when I paid a fiver for it it seemed a bargain at the time.
Sorry Christine - I got the pics. the wrong way round again. But my thanks for the explanation of the technical differences between paint and enamel. Tell me, do you often go around scratching other peoples wares with your finger nails to test the difference? I also see that you have given me a wide margin of manufacturing dates -1837 to 1911 - I guess it must be in there somewhere. But thinking again I now believe that this is a case of glass copying a Greek or Roman style of terracotta type of vase. Somewhere in the dim distant past I have seen something like an Amphora with legs like this - a large clay vase body which has a pointed bottom, and consequently needs supporting on legs. Anyway, there is a connection there somewhere, I'm sure. Having looked a lots of pics. of British vases, I dont see anything with legs like these, so perhaps not from this sceptered isle, and Andy is right with Bohemia, or very similar. Lets see what response he gets back from Moser.
I bet if we had the time to go thru books showing illustrations of examples of Mediterranean terracotta wares, we might find something.
If you wud like to buy it Andy - its £110. (and without commission).
As for the flora - when I first looked I thought the flower part seemed a bit Clematisy - but the leaves are wrong. When I have the time I will look properly in a book.
Streuth - where wud we be without books!! cheers Paul.