Anne - my apologies if I have confused you, not intended I can assure you

(but certainly thick I am at times). I was simply taking Ivo's reference to the word Hyalith. If you then search Hyalith on the link I gave, it re-directs you to imitation stone - and then proceeds to liken Hyalith to Agate (in either black or red). Agate, as we all know, is not a uniform colour, and is a mixture of banded colours, which may be predominantly in one direction, but not necessarily so. My original thought had been that possibly this 'non-uniform mixture of shades/colours had perhaps been a reason why Hyalith had a limited use or appeal. Traditionally, perhaps there was always a higher demand for glass with a uniform colour, whatever that may have been rather than a motley collection of varying shades. Your statement that "so Hyalith for pure black would be correct" - is really a contradition in terms, and is not true of an 'agate type appearance', which is not pure black or red (or pure any colour). There would be no point in using the word agate unless there was some reason for doing so, and in a uniform pure colour there is no need. Over to you