Hi , Christine thanks for the information

I meant to reply on this but forgot. Alfredo has id'd this as Kralik from the 1929/1930 Butler Brothers catalogue.
After you posted I had another look at it. To be honest I have no books to look at so I can't reference Goldberg and understand what kind of variation there is in quality. However I have taken more photos and had a good look round the net to try and find similar examples and see what difference there might be between others and this one.
Originally I just bought it because I loved it so didn't look too closely apart from to realise immediately about the pin prick holes in the orange. I took pics having done a lot of searching and posted it up.
Having looked more closely again now, it is in really good condition and appears to be well made. There is minimal damage to the coralene, the rim of the lid and the bowl are both ground and polished and there appears to be only a tiny rough edge to the lid on the ground edge in one part and some pin prick size fleabites really minute on the edge of the rim on the lid (I recognise this doesn't impact on the decoration quality). The coralene really glistens under light presumably because it is clear coralene beads, I didn't think I had seen clear beads on any other of the vases I saw. I have posted more pictures to show the decor more clearly and when lit properly it is pretty beautiful.
However having taken photos again under a very strong halogen light, I noticed something odd. See photos below. I got a bit of a shock as I could see 'glue' trailing under the beads. I felt pretty certain that this is not a fake and that this is not recent decoration on an older box :huh: But having never seen another piece, I investigated further and found two links, one to a piece listed as Webb and another to a piece listed as Harrach. When I examined them more closely it appears to me that they are also made of clear beads but the difference is they have coloured glue under the beads making the decor 'appear' a different colour. The coral effect is the same as mine and so is the application. So I am none wiser on what the difference in quality may be

I think the following photos show it in a better light? What do you think? m