Hi,
I had this piece bookmarked, partly because I couldn't believe the logic being applied. It ain't this, this, and this - so it must be that. What a load of tosh! No point in emailing the seller as that would likely achieve nothing, other than frustration.
On that note, I have to say that this series of wares have been around for as long as I can recall (I've been collecting for 35 years and deaeling for nearly 25 years). To date nobody has found any clues to the identity of the maker/manufacturer.
The piece you have bought is a good shape and a fair price for these unattributable wares (especially given the BiN price!).
People have attributed all the names that were discounted by the seller, but none of those manufacturers have shapes that match enough of the shapes in the series to allow attribution to them. Over the years they have been always referred to as Czech. This is more than likely a misnomer given what we have been learning over recent years.
As for the Gray-Stan attribution, wrong shape, wrong colour and wrong pontil mark. Shape not recorded as being in their reportoir - my own research combined with the book
20th Century British Glass,by Hajdamach.
Nigel
It may be that other viewers will be able to shed light on this question, if so, it will be another move forward
