sincere thanks to both of you for your expertise - I'm a little dim on the technicalities of these pressed pieces, so...............
In truth Anne, I hadn't thought of the possibility of difficulties with the seams and pattern repeats, and you may well be correct. However, there are in fact six columns of lenses running vertically, and I see that one of the seams runs through the centre of the handle - although the trouble with that seam is that after leaving the bottom of the handle, it wanders of course, and is no longer in line with where it started - almost as though someone twisted the foot slightly

quote from Lustrousstone................"The snapped pontil mark is explained by the applied handle" - please explain Christine, I'm a bit thick today.

I thought that the blob of glass was dropped into the mould - down came the plunger, and that was the end of it - i.e. so the base of the piece should not be showing a pontil scar, just the impression of the bottom of the mould
