Topic: Amber(ish) pressed glass posy vase - Bagley 'Bamboo'?

[wolkenreb]

I have this little posy vase which I'd like to ID.  It reminds me of the Bagley 'Bamboo' pattern, but I can't find any reference to a posy bowl.  Also, the colour isn't like other Bagley amber I have (which is quite bright, almost orange - at least the frosted Bagley items I have are).  Actually, this is a  more caramel than amber.  Star cut base (is that the right terminology?).

4³/4" wide by 3¹/4" high.

And the frog doesn't look right for Bagley either - not domed - but I'd say it's definitely the correct frog for this bowl.

Any help will be much appreciated!

[Lustrousstone]

It looks like the Jacobean aka Lord pattern. What's the base like? It's not Bagley. Davidson maybe

[wolkenreb]

Thanks Christine.  Here's a close-up of the base with the star pattern.  Who made Jacobean aka Lord?

[Lustrousstone]

Is it ground then polished and very shiny or just out of the mould? Inwald and then Davidson made it.
http://www.cloudglass.com/ClaytonMayers.htm

[wolkenreb]

Ground and polished Christine.  Many thanks for the link - quote "There is probably more Jacobean glassware around than any other style of pressed glass."  I've never come across it before(!) but am very pleased to have an id.

[Lustrousstone]

Inwald then. It's mostly clear. Now you've seen it you'll see it everywhere

[wolkenreb]

Inwald it is then.  Thank you!

[bat20]

hi all,just stumbled over this thread and i have one of them with an rd 702448 stamped just above the base,no block unfortunately..

[Paul S.]

hello - I'm just curious as to whether your Rd. No. might actually be 702446, which was a Clayton Mayer registration from 17th December 1923  -  rather than 702448             I mention this as 1923 was the year in which Clayton first imported 'Jacobean' from Inwald in Czechoslvakia.

The attached pic is Bagley 'Bamboo' in uranium.

[bat20]

It looks like an 8 to me Paul,but the house magnifying glass has gone walkies!After reading this thread i followed the leads from it and they seemed to suggest the tumblers were 702446,so i took it that this little vase was reg'd soon after,i wouldn't be surprised if it was a 6 though..