Hi George, and welcome to the GMB.
Quote from Eve Thrower & Mark Hill,
Frank Thrower & Dartington Glass, Mark Hill Publishing, 2007, p46, below a photograph of a Flame FT59 with some colour variation:-
The variation in colours on this example, indicates that pieces was probably a 'second' due to the thick neck and thin glass of the body which results in the widely varied orange and red colours. Nevertheless these features are deemed highly appealing today.Once you have fought your way past the terrible English and appalling punctuation, I think what they are trying to say is that it was probably classified as a second when produced but now is very collectable.
So don't be concerned. It is much more likely to be authentic than a perfect, evenly coloured example. Think about it. Fakers don't usually fake seconds (except, perhaps, upside down WF drunken bricklayers)!
Bernard C.
