Hi, thanks for that, didn’t know the term ‘wafer’...or didn’t remember it

. Oldglassman doesn’t mention the wafer and I wasn’t questioning the date. I have a few 19c rummer type glasses, and others types, and have never seen the wafer applied in the middle of the stem unless it is a repair. I have a victorian wine glass with bladed knop in which the stem has snapped above the knop, it has been repaired in a way that resembles the op’s glass.
When you look at brucebanner’s photos, especially the second one in the original post, it looks very much like two different styles joined together, especially as they don’t seem to line up along the axis. The wafer below the knop looks particularly rough and inelegant, there is another (neat and tidy) wafer above the bladed knop that joins the original stem to the bowl - why is the wafer below the knop so obvious and untidy? Also, the stem must have been faceted before attaching below the knop, otherwise you wouldn’t have clearance to get the wheel in, or there would be wheel marks on the wafer - I’ve never seen this before. In my experience, when the stem is faceted, there isn’t usually an obvious join in the stem like this, but the join is ground away in the faceting and looks much more professional.
In view of of fact that the rim has been tampered with, it seems likely - given the way it looks - that the stem is also not as original....or that’s what I would suspect if it was mine. In my opinion, that makes it more interesting. The only peice of porcelain I own has been stapled, and that’s why I bought it.
