Topic: Light green jug ID please

[flying free]

Rach can you add some clear pictures of the glass showing the bubbles etc.

Sue, me too - I still think it is but the mold blown base is odd to me.

m

[Lustrousstone]

No pontil mark on hand-blown jugs is quite common.
Sue it's no good showing the page on my website because it depends how you or the default have sorted. You need to copy the link in the info under the picture when you click on the thumbnail.

[flying free]

ok, that's strange I would have thought though for S&W (the no pontil mark)
But in that case, I also I thought it was S&W  as well.
Single colour alabaster and possibly missing a lid?
It looks similar to my condiment pots
http://www.glassmessages.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=56212.0;attach=164202;image
m

[chopin-liszt]

Doh.
There was more than one image, and the page came up nicely with other similar items.
I didn't do a "computery" search, I went through your Uranium Album page by page.



http://lustrousstone.co.uk/cpg/displayimage.php?pid=1797
http://lustrousstone.co.uk/cpg/displayimage.php?album=1&pid=1798#top_display_media

(I get in a muddle copying links from under - it's so much easier to copy the link in the wwww-y box at the top)

[Lustrousstone]

Copying from the browser bar doesn't often work for data base based websites because that varies depending on how you got there. What I see as a page may not be what you see. My website is very searchable honest.
Your second like should be http://lustrousstone.co.uk/cpg/displayimage.php?pid=1798

The number on the end is the unique number for each item and that never changes.

[chopin-liszt]

 
I couldn't remember the name to search for. I just know what the image looks like, but I can't stick that in a search engine.
I believe you that it is very searchable - I'm just not good at searches.
I'm just not compatible with computery stuff. I don't understand it, I don't "get" it.
It makes absolutely no sense that pages from a link turn up differently for different folk.
That's just another stupid computery dirty trick.

[Lustrousstone]

You could have used posy or mushroom or jade... Think of an online database like a box of index cards not a computery thing. You and I have two identical sets but you have filed yours one way and I have filed mine another.  The only way to describe a particular card to someone else is to use its unique identifier.

In this case http://lustrousstone.co.uk/cpg/displayimage.php?pid=1797 where the green bit is the name of the box file and the red number is the particular card.

[chopin-liszt]

It's unique identifiers which have to be words or numbers that mess me up. I can't cope with them or the "single card" which could be anywhere, notion.

I "file" things in piles, I know what features make something belong to one pile or another and they tend to be visual, not wordy. So when I want to find something, I know which heap of stuff I need to go through.
I can't come up with a new unique identifier for every single thing, far too many things end up with the same descriptor.
That's why I can't find anything, even on my own pc, and have to trawl trhough thousands of images just to find the one I need.

I'd got myself stuck on "jadeite" too, rather than Jade, and had managed to forget mushrooms and posies as well as S&W.
But I did find it! And I rather enjoyed going through all your lovely images. I had a good drool over your glorious Kralik "bothery" basket on the way.