hello chaz - the short answer is no, I'm afraid.
As a personal comment only, I'd plump for 'ewer' rather than jug, but for all I know these words may be interchangeable anyway.
As for obvious characteristics - the pincered decoration was common in the second half C19, and although I could be wrong, your handle appears to be of the 'dab' sort.
In general handles were applied using one of two methods - the pump handle being the earlier and used mostly during the C18 and into first half C19 , where it was attached first at the top then looped down and attached at the bottom - the later method is called the dab, and is attached in reverse, and started around c. mid 1860s.
As I say I could be wrong with your handle - not easy to see in your pix, which are too busy - nice rustic view with field, post, barbed wire and clouds - but these are distracting and more helpful if the background is a plain dark colour - something in the way of a large sheet of paper or similar.
With older glass, treatment of the underside of the foot is either to leave this alone entirely so that the pontil scar remains (provided it isn't going to scratch the table) - or, to grind/polish the scar creating a shallow depression which mostly is polished and not left rough. Perhaps if we might see a picture of your foot this might help, although it won't provide an accurate date. Both rough scars and polished depressions occur at most dates in the C18 and C19 (though not on the same piece).
You may well be correct, and this could be a local production, but it's an unsophisticated piece and as such lacks conformity with standard designs thus making dating more difficult.
In the absence of comparison with other identical pieces of known provenance, it's very unlikely you'll ever determine a maker, unfortunately.
Was this piece sold to you with an attached date or description? Of course we do have other perhaps better informed members, so let's hope they are free this morning and not out shopping
