Topic: Help ID glass goblet / wineglass with gold rim and decorated band - ID = Moser

[Lustrousstone]

Copenhagen was designed in 1909. I would also expect them to be marked on the base

[brucebanner]

I can not get a really good look at the original glass but does the foot look modern moulded and there are so many of them so i would have thought made for a while?, is it called design 1909 based on an older shape?.

Not sure if Moser d0 not sign seconds like Stuart Crystal for example?.


http://www.moser-glass.com/en/p/drinking-set-copenhagen-9900/

A Victorian modern set by Moser http://www.moser-glass.com/en/p/drinking-set-lady-hamilton-4400/

[Paul S.]

As we know, some of Stuart's designs for drinking glasses had much longevity of production, and lasted until their demise.         
How times change   -  for eons people wanted lead glass with a ring that resonated and descriptive terms such as 34% lead crystal, were a sign of high end guaranteed quality.
And now we see sales ploys of the Moser 'Copenhagen' pattern reading  '........ecologically friendly lead-free crystal ...............'     so no longer any point in flicking your glasses to impress the guests. 

Could be wrong, but don't I recall that when we've had 'oroplastic' before, some of the frieze designs shown some form of Greek influence - so maybe not essential that the design is of a floral nature?

[flying free]

As Paul mentioned, some of these oroplastic designs have figures on them.

Anne, I think that is just worded that in their particular case, the oroplastic design happens to be one with a floral border.
That is, it does not have to be floral to be considered oroplastic.


m

[Anne Tique]

Ah ok, thank you for the explanation.

[Lustrousstone]

The pattern number is 9900, but the original design dates from 1909

[serafin]

Thank you very much to all, it is incredible how fast you found who made it and the model, I am very grateful, Is there a way of knowing what year they were manufactured ? They are not marked on the bootom ,again thank you all very much,

[Lustrousstone]

Probably not unless you can find a mark on any of them