Hi thomthom49 - referencing your other post re the Stuart cut designs from Ross - I thought I'd used that link to the Ross/Stuart cut patterns in the past couple of years - perhaps not - and to make matters worse can't now find it in my own archives. From memory haven't a clue as to whether it showed Villiers cut design - I think possibly not since Villiers appears not to be on the Board's archive gallery of cut designs. I thought it was on the Board somewhere, but now don't know where.
Did anyone else save the details?? I have a feeling - but could be very wrong - that the book of factory patterns, donated by Ross, pre-dated the birth of Villiers (sounds like 'The Birth of Venus'

) which according to McConnell was c. 1930 - so on that basis Villiers wouldn't have appeared in the book from Ross.
As with much of Stuart's material from earlier in the C20, the factory were mostly Registering shapes rather than cut designs - which is rather unhelpful for us now.
How did you know that the glasses from the auction were the Villiers pattern - did the auction house list them as such? In the McConnell/Miller's book it appears that the factory No. for Villiers is 25404 - although that's not really of any help here, since we've no way of accessing Stuart's original factory patterns - they may be at Broadfield House, but not sure.
Unfortunately, post 1930 cut glass seems currently to have a minority following on the GMB - that's not to say there isn't a market for the high end deco designs, which have always been very collectible, but there's little interest in run of the mill patterns.
As to working out which shape fits which sort of booze for the glasses you do have - would recommend you search the Replacement.com site - in the Stuart section. You probably won't find all that you want under the heading of Villiers, but if you search other patterns then you can probably assess what you have from the various shapes in that archive site. Sorry - we seem to be on a rather negative run for you.
P.S. meant to suggest that this thread might perhaps be moved to the British and Irish section.
[Mod: moved as suggested]