No-one likes general adverts, and ours hadn't been updated for ages, so we're having a clear-out and a change round to make the new ones useful to you. These new adverts bring in a small amount to help pay for the board and keep it free for you to use, so please do use them whenever you can, Let our links help you find great books on glass or a new piece for your collection. Thank you for supporting the Board.

Author Topic: A Deceptive or Toasting Glass  (Read 660 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Laird

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 82
  • I'm new, please be gentle
    • United Kingdom
A Deceptive or Toasting Glass
« on: February 21, 2020, 02:10:05 PM »
Here's one that puzzles me. It is a 'toastmaster' or deceptive glass, nice and chunky, heavy with cut flutes.
Double knop on a raised foot, and striation marks around the bowl. I believe I can detect a slight thickening at a point on the rim where the bowl would have been trimmed with shears. The pontil is polished, with a small scar left behind.
The shape suggests to me 18th century, but is it? Opinions?

I have another couple of deceptives which I will post.

Support the Glass Message Board by finding a book via book-seek.com


Offline Paul S.

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 9938
  • Gender: Male
Re: A Deceptive or Toasting Glass
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2020, 10:07:14 AM »
of course, you may well be correct, but …………………….               of some concern is the fact that of all the toastmaster glasses in Bickerton (C18 material. plus a little more), none has slice/panel cutting like this one  -  engraving yes, but not this sort of real slice cutting (not flutes possibly).
The other query for attribution to C18 is the height of the actual bowl  -  most are noticeably shorter.

The knops, striation marks and rim blip (where the shears begin and end), don't in themselves indicate exclusively C18.

Agree this is a difficult 'deceptive' to pigeonhole'  -  might be very late C18/early C19, or possibly nearer to 1840-1850.

As usual the silence from others is deafening, unfortunately  -  whether it's possible to hope Peter (oldglassman) might look in  -  not sure.

However, this is an interesting and unusual deceptive glass, and a good addition to anyone's collection - nice piece.

Let's hope the other pieces you mention are easier to date. ;)

 

Support the Glass Message Board by finding glass through glass-seek.com


Offline Laird

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 82
  • I'm new, please be gentle
    • United Kingdom
Re: A Deceptive or Toasting Glass
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2020, 12:21:15 PM »
Thanks Paul - I very much appreciate your always pertinent and helpful comments.
Attributing makers and dates to such items is a struggle. if only they had put hallmarks on them, as in silver, but I guess I'm not the first to make that observation.
I like the shape of this one, somewhat different from others I have seen, and I thought that might be an indicator for an earlier date attribution, but I don't know enough, by far, to go out on a limb proposing such a conclusion.
Using Wilkinson as my guide, I thought the foot was a fairly good match for Fig. 1 (4,5) which he dates as 1730 to 1780. He also says that "the shearing mark, to a greater or less degree, is on every handmade drinking glass made in England before 1830. Should no mark be visible it has either had the top trimmed to remove a chip, or has been made after 1830, when the wooden end tool or woods had superseded the steel tool or pucelas".
This all suggested to me a possible pre-1830 date - but that's a shot in the dark.

Hopefully, I'll post another couple of different examples over the weekend.

Support the Glass Message Board by finding a book via book-seek.com


 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
Visit the Glass Encyclopedia
link to glass encyclopedia
Visit the Online Glass Museum
link to glass museum


This website is provided by Angela Bowey, PO Box 113, Paihia 0247, New Zealand