Bless your heart for checking all those Webb shapes--I am SO impressed! And it was brilliant, Keith and Anne, to suggest casting about for another attribution. Unfortunately, I don't have much information on Stuart and Richardson glass (if anyone has a recommendation for a good book that covers their glass, I would be eternally grateful), but I do have the Glass of John Walsh Walsh book by Eric Reynolds. This shape vase is shown in fig. 139, 145, and possibly fig. 104 (the rim on 104 looks like it curves in a tad). This shape is also shown in over a dozen figures in the back of the book from the two factory pattern books that have been recovered. It would have made my day if my pattern had been shown, but alas, in all the cuttings shown on this shape, none matched my piece. There is an example of a flower cutting out of a central clear circle (fig. 92), but it is not even remotely as complex as my vase. But most of the records of the company were destroyed when the factory closed, so all of their patterns are not known. Also, the book talks about all the innovation and creativity that was going on in the cutting shop, so if this is even John Walsh Walsh, it may not be a production piece. The book also says that their mark "can also be seen on the edge of the base or foot, but this is frequently obscured or totally obliterated by wear--a particular problem on heavy vases, ..." and "this mark was applied by acid etching and this process only produces a faint impression." Of course, my luck that this vase is heavy and is quite worn on the bottom. So maybe John Walsh Walsh...